It’s interesting as I was in John Lewis in Brent Cross yesterday (I don’t normally go there) and an older couple were wandering round the bags and shoes sections debating designer or not and the man was saying “just because it’s xxx doesn’t mean it’s worth xxx money” he also commented the same on a Radley bag!
I know people who when they buy eg Michael Kors, Ted Baker etc they think it’s something to aspire to and sort of designer. They wouldn’t necessarily buy a designer bag but at this price point it fits their remit. If a few other people they know have it it’s like a club.
I also knew a friend of DM’s (a teacher) who whether abroad or in this country bought a couple of Burberry bags which she was very pleased about and then complained to us once that her boyfriend’s DM commented “x has a Burberry bag!” in a surprised comment. The friend either told the DM or commented to herself “yes I have 2-3 Burberry bags!” But she was put out by the fact that her boyfriend’s DM thought she couldn’t afford etc the designer bag.
I do think of Marc Jacobs as higher end than eg Coach or Kate Spade and I think along same lines as other designer high end bags.
When I was younger up to a certain age I could’ve bought designer bags but just didn’t. I think I might’ve got a Mulberry bag when they were cheaper and better made. And even after that I actually preferred Miu Miu to eg Prada but mostly due to the design.
I’ve known close friends with designer bags - like LV monogram or Chloe Paddington when it was very trendy but they tend to see those as “aspirational” brands and also if it’s trendy at the time all the better. A friend who had the LV bags said “well I just like nice things and can afford them”.
Even when I was in USA when younger I was encouraged to buy by friends and did get a Coach black leather bag because the exchange rate was great and also they thought it was a nice bag. My friend wasn’t into designer labels at all but her DM loved shopping and Bloomies.