Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Style and beauty

Looking for style advice? Chat all about it here. For the latest discounts on fashion and beauty, sign up for Mumsnet Moneysaver emails.

Royal style: Monochrome Megs is back in town!

999 replies

QueenOfTheAndals · 06/01/2020 20:12

new thread!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
70
PhannyMcNee · 09/01/2020 19:27

Denzil wears leather trousers well too I feel Crown Grin

Royal style: Monochrome Megs is back in town!
MotherofPearl · 09/01/2020 19:36

I really don't get the Keanu love.

ShockShock

frugalkitty · 09/01/2020 19:37

He wouldn't make it to the airing cupboard.....someone's got to keep the sheets warm Grin

frugalkitty · 09/01/2020 19:39

Alternative eye candy suggestions welcome....there's little in the way of royal fashion to discuss at present!

Wetdogloveshubert · 09/01/2020 20:03

Oh my goodness, I step away for a few short hours and come back to pure smut. SMUT I TELL YOU.

fans self

Keanu deserves his own threads, and with good reason. If I were menopausal I'd be hyperventilating right now, I think. He is one of my teen idols.

I know it's already been posted, but this picture of Kate really is gorgeous. It's a re-emphasis of her Vogue cover, and just lovely styling. This is my kind of weekend wear, were I a size 10 again.

Royal style: Monochrome Megs is back in town!
Grinchly · 09/01/2020 20:07

@StraightenUpAndFryRight GrinGrinGrin
Thank you so much for the Red Trouser Song. I had some sad news today and that really cheered me up too.

Grinchly · 09/01/2020 20:09

That's a lovely pic of Kate. I think she is very beautiful.

RoaringKitten · 09/01/2020 20:16

Long time reader of these threads (since original one) but never posted.

The timing of the PR was interested... generally royals do morning releases. This was done later in the day... morning for the US. Perfectly timed for their new timezone.

Love that picture of Kate. That’s her Fjallraven jumper. I considered buying it as I liked so much when she first wore it but as our shapes are fairly opposite what suits her definitely doesn’t suit me!

StraightenUpAndFryRight · 09/01/2020 20:24

Grinchly and Romaine glad to be of some use Flowers

WineOrGinOrBoth · 09/01/2020 20:41

Kate photographs well - I think she looks best in casual clothes.

frugalkitty · 09/01/2020 20:47

Glad to be of service wetdog Grin

Welcome RoaringKitten I think you're spot on about the timing of the announcement, good spot.

StartupRepair · 09/01/2020 21:00

If that's Charlene looking happy...

ElspethFlashman · 09/01/2020 21:03

I tend to criticise Kate a lot for her endless buying of identical coats (I mean whyyyyyy) but I can't fault her on her casual wear.

She wears her jumpers into the ground!

QueenOfTheAndals · 09/01/2020 21:08

Glad I'm not the only one who thought that @StartupRepair but I think she's had so much Botox and filler she can barely move her face, so maybe that is happy!

OP posts:
RoaringKitten · 09/01/2020 21:11

At the risk of too much H&M and not enough clothes discussion, interesting that they used a small Toronto based agency for their new site, that mainly does fashion and lifestyle. Is that where they see their fit?

madebyarticle.com/

SenecaFalls · 09/01/2020 21:20

It has been all over US news media; last night it made the NBC nightly newscast, which considering everything that is going on in the US right now and in the world because of the US, that shows the level of interest on this side of the pond.

Needless to say, there is quite a bit of sympathy for them here. One thing that I think is different in the US than in the UK is the capacity that people have for sympathy with people of privilege. Meghan and Harry (especially Meghan) are perceived by many here (including me) as being victims of targeted campaigns of abuse. There is not the expectation as there seems to be by so many people in the UK (less so by posters on these threads, by the way) that they should just suck it up because they are privileged. Also I think, given our history, many Americans understand that being a person of color subtracts a large portion of whatever privilege may otherwise exist because of rank or fortune.

Grinchly · 09/01/2020 21:25

As I said on another thread - the copy on that website is cringeworthy.
It's awful. Tone deaf, arrogant, ridiculous, over-weaning.
It's terrible.

WineOrGinOrBoth · 09/01/2020 21:29

Quite Grinchly. They don’t need sympathy - they are extremely privileged & their current behaviour is like toddlers throwing a tantrum IMO.

justasking111 · 09/01/2020 21:31

Just checking out their trademark and all the products listed. It is interesting that jewellery has been left out. I thought perhaps MM would enjoy that side of the business. She wears some interesting stuff.

trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/History/1/UK00003408521

paradyning · 09/01/2020 21:31

I think when things get heavy we should throw in random Keanu pictures. Although SFF and fitty Norwegian bloke HH do have a similar look to him.

frugalkitty · 09/01/2020 21:35

Seneca I wonder if such sympathy is because privilege in America is more likely to be self-made rather than inherited to the degree that can be the case here (literally stretching through hundreds of years). And certainly less likely to be funded or subsidised by the tax payer.

frugalkitty · 09/01/2020 21:41

paradyning with bonus points for wearing leather trousers Grin It might be harder to get pics of Haakon and Felipe in leather but in the name of research I'm happy to have a look.....

Royal style: Monochrome Megs is back in town!
SenecaFalls · 09/01/2020 21:47

frugalkitty I do think the difference has a lot to do with historical differences in class systems in the US. I think that there is less resentment of privilege in the US because, while we do have a class system, it is perceived to be much flatter than in the UK.

mathanxiety · 09/01/2020 21:54

RoaringKitten the US is currently preoccupied with our mad, bad president trying to start a war with Iran and the effect that will have on gasoline prices. Nobody really cares all that much about shenanigans in Buckingham Palace right now.

@Sooverthemill
^I completely agree with your post of Thu 09-Jan-20 11:32:47.
M is genuinely imo committed to equalities and women's rights and empowerment and Andrew doesn't sit easily with that. He has had no real flack from the RF about his poor judgement ( at best). And with no constitutional role and a hell of a lot of heirs before him Harry isn't needed^

Agree with @BlingLoving Thu 09-Jan-20 10:21:51 too.
...one or both of them will accept paid work in the form of speaking roles etc. They'll fundraise massively for their foundation which they will then be very involved in how it puts out its funds (think Bill and Melinda Gates).

And throughout that, they'll have the support of most people in North America (USA and Canada) and a huge swathe of the UK population who have a more modern view. The old Royal Reporters and the forelock tugging types who are outraged that a 30 something grandson doesn't spend christmas with his Grandmother are not going to be in their sphere any more and their view, I think, will be that as those people aren't the ones who help them raise money and change the world, and as they're not accepting money from those people, they're not interested.

And YYY to all the criticism of management.
banivani Thu 09-Jan-20 09:43:18 your post is spot on.
BP has a lot to learn from the Swedes.

The government and the Royal Family and the entire frothing, inward looking /asshole-gazing British Establishment and press are failing to grasp what a massive opportunity this is for British 'soft power' globally, and what a massive gift to British 'soft power' Meghan Markle is (or was) if only it had been played right.

Here was an extremely intelligent, articulate, beautiful, talented, charming woman from another country, a different culture, with an education that encouraged a spirit of charity and giving and using your talents to the full, with family and racial origins distinct from those of the usual marriage pool into which the RF tapped, with the potential to take the Royal Family brand and with it the British brand and really run with both - and nobody wanted to see any of that.

She was treated instead as a sponger, a stranger, and someone looking out for what the Royal Family could do for her.

There is a limit to how far the likes of Downton Abbey and Doc Martin and Hyacinth Bucket and even Sherlock Holmes or James Bond can take Brand Britain. The potential of H&M was far greater, and even now, nobody is able to see how this surprise could be turned into opportunity. The Buckingham Palace statement was baffling. Airing dirty linen in public is always a terrible idea. If BP put out any statement at all it should have covered up the fact that there have been no discussions with H&M about their decision. A no statement response would have been better than the one they issued. Whoever is doing their PR is a complete amateur. They should have said they look forward to working with H&M to make sure the future is bright for them and restating the hope that Commonwealth ties will become all the stronger as a result of H&M's decision.

Now the press are seemingly in competition amongst themselves to see who can be the most obnoxious over the decision, there are shrill calls from the public of 'don't let the door hit you on the way out' and obvious disarray in Buckingham Palace, on top of the gross mishandling of the Andrew scandal (and all in the context of the Brexit decision and subsequent political mess) and it all makes Britain look like a country completely failing to see or grasp reality, a country determined to shoot itself in the foot, publicly.

I ALSO think their PR is aimed at people like them and not the average man in the street. And I'm not sure if that's a purposeful strategy because ultimately they want to be big in the USA or if it's a sign of their inability to understand the reality of the UK public and media BlingLoving Thu 09-Jan-20 09:57:30
I suspect they have decided to bypass the UK public and media completely and treat them as irrelevant, which actually, given the global scope of their plans, they are.

mathanxiety · 09/01/2020 21:55

M is genuinely imo committed to equalities and women's rights and empowerment and Andrew doesn't sit easily with that. He has had no real flack from the RF about his poor judgement ( at best). And with no constitutional role and a hell of a lot of heirs before him Harry isn't needed

Blush italic fail.