Huh? No man should be paying for kids that aren’t his as the expense of kids that are.
Well I agree on the face of it they shouldn’t. But in situations when it comes to things like universal credit or child tax credits, the RP’s income will potentially go down if a partner moves in. The RP should know this anyway and only move someone in if they’re prepared to make up the shortfall. That’s really what I meant and I should have made that clearer.
I know the general rule on here is that women are never in the wrong, but this is a clear scenario when being female confers an unfair advantage.
Any woman that complains on here about paying for step kids is met with outraged cries of ‘YOU SHOULDNT HAVE TO PAY ANYTHING FOR KIDS THAT ARENT YOURS LTB’
Well I don’t see why she should. If her partner is seeing his child EOW for example then I can’t see why he can’t provide for his child himself. It’s not a lot to ask really, is it?
Also not sure about the drama free part. They often have to deal with the exes…
I don’t think to the extent that stepmums do.
But even so, even if the dad does cause trouble for the stepdad it’s a lot easier to tell the dad to fuck off and soon he will get the message. For example if the dad demanded the stepdad picks the dsc up on his days, both mum and stepdad would be able to say no and the stepdad gets to carry on with his day. With mums and stepmums, it’s constant scrutiny and demands regarding the children and the stepmum doesn’t hear the end of it.
Also, the stepdad is less likely to have to put up with silly favouritism of the older dc by his in laws. I bet no mum’s parents do what dad’s parents do, nor would any mum allow it. Stepmums have to put up with their dc being treated as second class because the in laws feel the need to overcompensate and the dad does nothing about.
Then the stepdad is in a relationship with the mum. That’s less drama for him to begin with. The amount of women who have to put up with lazy men and parent his children for him. Stepdads don’t get any of that.