I am still struggling to see how anyone can justify that £50 per week/ £200pcm for 3 children and 2 with Type 1 diabetes is reasonable. Ignoring that some people get less than that - £2400 per annum does not cover 50% of the costs to feed clothe, entertain etc 3 children. In this scenario £800 per child per annum.
Last year my lovely insulin dependent 6 yr old grew and grew ( finally!) : in one school year
4 sets of school shoes £25 each,
5 sets of trainers £15 each,
5 sets of football boots - £20 each.
6 pairs of school trousers - £8-10 each
12 T shirts ( size, gross filth etc) £70
4 school jumpers (thank god for summer) £40
20 pairs of socks min £20
sports shorts and tops 3 sets : £40
That was £600+ just on school uniform.If I were to get what the OPs partner gives, £300 is the fathers contribution from the £800 has just gone on school uniform. We do not buy cheap shoes/trainers because of teaching him about looking after his feet.
Living with children with type 1 diabetes is hard work and v stressful. When very young it is full on trying to control their sugars, let them be kids, deal with the rebellion......
The children live with Mum 70% of the time, 2 nights per week is minimal and what about 50% of the holidays etc.
OP you do not get tax credits because the DCs do not live with you enough, Mum is entitled to the CB, because the DCS live with her and she does not earn enough. If this is the correct amount Op, your DP earns about £15000 per annum!
So the person who suggested cutting maintenance to £30pw, why. The costs of the children have not gone down, just because the father has new other costs.
This attitude of NRP has suddenly increased costs at home, therefore first thing to go is cut the maintenance is morally wrong. Cut the sky TV first... the EX is not funding the new lifestyle by picking up more of the costs of the new family.