Hi Bubblagirl
Just seen this again.
A - J is vague because they have not really said how they are going to impliment these strategies. It basically says very little in terms of HOW they going to do this or WHO is going to do this.
To give but two example:-
"d- his understanding of concepts and vocab to be developed through rl experiences and within variety of contexts"
"j- peers who can provide good language models and opportunities for small group and individual work on regular basis"
No re peers full stop.
Again they are stressing the small group and individual work on a regular basis. I would ask how regular exactly, again it is far too woolly to be of any real use or benefit.
Does Part 2 say anything at all about speech and language and or SALT provision?. I am guessing it does not but that needs to be in Part 2.
I can suggest that you talk to someone like IPSEA or SOS;SEN first thing Monday and run parts 2 and 3 past them as it is written. They can tell you what it should say and it will be very different from what Basildon LEA has written. They can also advise you re appealing to SENDIST.
My guess as well is that his hours will be totally made up of small group provision with no firm one to one support being provided. They want to provide support - but for as cheap as possible.
There is also no one to one lunchtime support provided and to get that from this LEA you're going to have to fight hard.
Who is involved in this "meeting around the child?" on the 22nd?. I would seek your own counsel re the Statement before that date.
Sorry I cannot be more positive but you can and should fight this bloody LEA tooth and nail for the provision your son both needs and deserves (I've been up against this particular lot before and won. You can do it too!!!).
Attila x