@Ahna65 I’m pleased I didn’t cause any offence, it’s hard to explain when you try to put something into words over the internet, I have a clumsy way of trying to explain something sensitively.
I didn’t mean low functioning just from having no speech alone, because I know it’s not that black and white, it also works in the opposite direction, ds used to be a lot lower functioning than he is now, but with speech! So I know from experience it’s not quite that simple. Also low / high functioning will mean different things to different people. We all have our own ideas on what those terms mean, I know some don’t like to use the terms at all, which is fine, but I do still use them.
Also a lot from the so called ‘lower functioning’ type lists, ds still does! I don’t see him as lower functioning though, not anymore. I don’t think that is just because he has speech. It’s because he is a proficient communicator. And understands most of what is said. When he didn’t have all of those combined skills I thought he was ‘lower functioning’ too, even when he had speech.
I made my own judgement on ds class on presentation, they are what ‘I’ would call lower functioning, non verbal, walking around in circles doing nothing but stimming, mouthing bricks, lots of noises, unable to sit down to tasks, highly motivated by playing toddler type games / ring around a roses that type of thing, no communication, and definitely no idea on social interaction, then lots ds tells me about things, and things I see on the parent app what the teacher will put on.
All those have made me come to the conclusion that ds is way beyond that type of level (now) So makes no sense to me to have him in a class with only those children. I want him to work on the next stages for him, especially with social interaction and he can’t do that if he’s only with children who aren’t anywhere at his current level.
Hope I make sense? and I haven’t managed to dig myself an even deeper hole! 🤣