Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Trans identified Mumsnet member AidaP is scraping Mumsnet

349 replies

BambooLampshade · 28/04/2026 21:34

Hi Mumsnet, though you should know that a trans identified man - who often posts on Mumsnet as @aidap - is scraping the feminimism board, in order to create some sort of grading system.

It's basically electronic stalking.

What is this?

Oh yes, I have downloaded most of mumsnet and we will be doing embeddings of the content to try to understand how does the rot and hate builds and spreads.

I never had so much hate and delusion on my hard drive before 😅

https://bsky.app/profile/aidap.bsky.social/post/3mkklbtpgbs2s

Aida (@aidap.bsky.social)

What is this? Oh yes, I have downloaded most of mumsnet and we will be doing embeddings of the content to try to understand how does the rot and hate builds and spreads. I never had so much hate and delusion on my hard drive before 😅

https://bsky.app/profile/aidap.bsky.social/post/3mkklbtpgbs2s

OP posts:
Thread gallery
15
Helleofabore · Yesterday 11:04

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:03

The Blind Dates thread was maybe a couple of weeks ago.

The club runner thread, maybe last year? I don't keep a record of these things.

Certain regulars were all over them. Tbf, the club runner thread was fairly balanced, as i recall it, with some people arguing that it was disgusting, and others 'the trans people made us do it'.

As I and others have noted, the threads have been deleted, but they were allowed to stand for ages.

So, you don’t keep records of these things… yet you then make direct accusations ?

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:05

Helleofabore · Yesterday 11:04

So, you don’t keep records of these things… yet you then make direct accusations ?

Yes, I'm making a direct accusation. I remember the threads clearly.

womendeserveequalhumanrights · Yesterday 11:13

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:05

Yes, I'm making a direct accusation. I remember the threads clearly.

Making direct accusations against other posters breaks mumsnet talk guidelines as it is a personal attack.

Edited to add: It's also weird behaviour from someone who claims that it's horrible to claim someone is something they're not - as it's exactly the behaviour on display here.

Helleofabore · Yesterday 11:15

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:04

So posters weren't mocking, they were transvestigating.

Not a great defence tbh.

So, you think any discussion as to whether a person might be male yet being said to be female where sex matters and giving reasons for that concern to be mocking.

And that those raising valid points are to be demonised because you, personally, don’t consider it reasonable. Good to know you cannot see the difference.

That the thread was deleted is a sign of moderation working.

Sometimes the moderation team will allow a thread to continue with their attention to see how it progresses because the thread may not be unreasonable in itself. They will take action when they have judged something has gone too far or the OP was not posting in the spirit of the site. However, they are usually a good judge of reasonable standards.

I would suggest that you report any threads you deem to be ‘mocking’ and if it isn’t deleted, there is an indication as to whether your personal standard is reasonable or overly sensitive.

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:15

womendeserveequalhumanrights · Yesterday 11:13

Making direct accusations against other posters breaks mumsnet talk guidelines as it is a personal attack.

Edited to add: It's also weird behaviour from someone who claims that it's horrible to claim someone is something they're not - as it's exactly the behaviour on display here.

Edited

Fine, report away.

womendeserveequalhumanrights · Yesterday 11:17

Generally speaking trying to shame people for doing the exact thing you're literally doing in plain sight is unlikely to be effective as it's quite hypocritical.

Reminds me of eco-campaigners telling us all not to fly as they jet around the world to climate conferences.

Helleofabore · Yesterday 11:20

womendeserveequalhumanrights · Yesterday 11:17

Generally speaking trying to shame people for doing the exact thing you're literally doing in plain sight is unlikely to be effective as it's quite hypocritical.

Reminds me of eco-campaigners telling us all not to fly as they jet around the world to climate conferences.

Yes.

And posting heart reaction emojis to posts where that can be construed as bullying behaviour is a sign that some posters don’t seem to be able to judge reasonable behaviour .

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 11:20

When was this? In the last week, the last year, the last decade?

It was fairly recently, why on earth do you need a time stamp?! Will that make it magically better? 😕

womendeserveequalhumanrights · Yesterday 11:25

Anyway, I'm done with a hypocritical derail which tries to shame a group of women for allegedly (with no evidence) behaving badly, and away from a man that has made rape threats online and who claims to be engaging in stalker-like behaviour against a wider group of women.

DeanElderberry · Yesterday 11:26

No, it is to see whether your accusation is founded in reality.

'fairly recently'. So post-Covid?

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 11:31

Definitely post COVID.
Maybe the last year or two? Not that long ago.
You don't have to believe me. I don't care.
Not everyone sees a thread, acknowledges the date and time and writes it down/marks it on their phone or whatever it is you're imagining, maybe that's what you do, who knows.

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 11:35

BeckyAMumsnet · Yesterday 09:24

Hi all,

Thanks for raising this, we’re aware of it and understand why it’s caused concern.

Scraping the site in this way isn’t permitted under our Terms of Use, and we’ll be taking appropriate action. The user in question was banned from Mumsnet a few weeks ago for breaching our Talk guidelines.

In terms of what’s actually involved, anything that can be scraped from the boards is content that is already publicly available on the site. It doesn’t provide access to private account information, email addresses, PMs or anything else behind the scenes.

We use many tools to scan for people scraping the site and block them when we spot them - but it is impossible to stop everyone who wants to do it - scrapers are often set up to look like a user just browsing the site. However, our tech team are investigating this particular case and doing all they can to try and identify the scraper and block it.

But of course we do appreciate that the idea of posts being aggregated or analysed elsewhere can feel uncomfortable, even where the underlying content is public. If that’s a concern for you, you’re very welcome to get in touch with us directly and we can look at a retrospective username change.

If you have any other questions or concerns, please do get in touch and we’ll respond as fully as we can.

MNHQ

Thank you.

I'm very glad to hear he's been banned.

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:41

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 11:31

Definitely post COVID.
Maybe the last year or two? Not that long ago.
You don't have to believe me. I don't care.
Not everyone sees a thread, acknowledges the date and time and writes it down/marks it on their phone or whatever it is you're imagining, maybe that's what you do, who knows.

Ironically that's what the subject of the thread (who, to be clear, is an obvious piece of shit) has done. We would agree it is very poor behaviour.

But you can't then, in the same breath, insist on date and time stamps for instances of abusive and transphobic threads that have regularly popped up, and lingered for too long.

I have no issue with MN moderation, except that they seem slow to act on occasion. Again, ironically, others have said the same about the poster subject of this thread. I would be surprised if they were milking the situation for clicks.

BillieWiper · Yesterday 11:47

Carla786 · Yesterday 01:55

Yes, there is Dadsnet and posters can't be banned for being male only.

Well yeah they can't ban someone for an anonymous identity that relies on the person admitting to/saying what sex they are.

If we suspected someone of being a man and they kept saying they weren't, we/MN wouldn't be able to prove it either way? Even though you do know.

BambooLampshade · Yesterday 11:55

WheretheFishesareFrightening · Yesterday 07:13

This is so sad, because as someone who does want to debate this all I see on here is this.

In fact I see more people wanting to debate in good faith than hate, who are constantly shut down by people like you saying that they’re not entertaining a debate. And that seems to be true on every online forum.

I don’t understand the trans position, and my view is that they should not be discriminated against for being trans, all while being treated in all cases as their biological sex. I’d love to find someone that would try to change my mind - but it’s always the same brick wall you’ve put up.

It does lead me to question whether there is no debate to be had though, and people just don’t want to has their logic and beliefs trampled on by “terfs”.

Just catching up with this now-very-long thread.

my view is that they should not be discriminated against for being trans, all while being treated in all cases as their biological sex.

That makes you a TERF. Welcome!

OP posts:
MyAmpleSheep · Yesterday 11:56

AStonedRose · Yesterday 11:41

Ironically that's what the subject of the thread (who, to be clear, is an obvious piece of shit) has done. We would agree it is very poor behaviour.

But you can't then, in the same breath, insist on date and time stamps for instances of abusive and transphobic threads that have regularly popped up, and lingered for too long.

I have no issue with MN moderation, except that they seem slow to act on occasion. Again, ironically, others have said the same about the poster subject of this thread. I would be surprised if they were milking the situation for clicks.

Edited

Are you aware that threads only get examined after they are reported? You (yes you!) are an important part of the moderation process.

Sitting back and waiting for a thread that you think is harmful to disappear is like watching a house burn down and waiting for someone else to call the fire brigade.

So - did you report the threads you found objectionable?

Tarquinosaurus · Yesterday 11:57

Odd that a post in Site Stuff about a now banned trolling poster has morphed into "no you're the mean ones!" because women can no longer trust that men will stay out of women's spaces.

IAmBeaIDrinkTea · Yesterday 11:59

Helleofabore · Yesterday 11:04

So, you don’t keep records of these things… yet you then make direct accusations ?

People have things called memories, you know.
Although of course there's no way of "proving that" with time stamps, and copying links and saving them to archives or whatever.... but that's seemingly expected it seems what with the calls for them.
Yet this is a thread denouncing (rightly!) someone who seems to be doing exactly that type of thing.

Beautifulhaiku · Yesterday 12:01

ArabellaScott · Yesterday 08:12

Some transwomen are fetishists and some are predators. This is simple fact.

Some e.g. podiatrists are also predators or fetishists, it doesn’t mean I’m going to talk about them as if assuming they all are.

AStonedRose · Yesterday 12:01

MyAmpleSheep · Yesterday 11:56

Are you aware that threads only get examined after they are reported? You (yes you!) are an important part of the moderation process.

Sitting back and waiting for a thread that you think is harmful to disappear is like watching a house burn down and waiting for someone else to call the fire brigade.

So - did you report the threads you found objectionable?

I certainly reported individual posts, which were (eventually) deleted. I wasn't aware it was possible to report an entire thread - I think the moderators have to do that off their own back. i could be mistaken?

Again, my issue isn't with moderation. it's with the fact that these horrible threads pop up in the first place.

The regulars either engage, or shrug their shoulders. And then, because those threads can't be linked to, confidently assert there's no transphobia on Mumsnet. As multiple posters on this thread have demonstrated well.

BIWI · Yesterday 12:05

You can report a whole thread by reporting the OP. In your report to MNHQ you can say why you're reporting the thread, or be specific about certain posts.

Then it's up to MNHQ to decide a) to delete the whole thread or b) delete certain posts.

It's really important to understand that you can (and should) report posts and threads if you think they're against Talk Guidelines.

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · Yesterday 12:05

@AStonedRose yes, you can report a whole thread.
You just report the actual OP and in the comments, you ask the mods to look at the thread as a whole.

Taztoy · Yesterday 12:06

TheBroonOneAndTheWhiteOne · Yesterday 12:05

@AStonedRose yes, you can report a whole thread.
You just report the actual OP and in the comments, you ask the mods to look at the thread as a whole.

That’s what I do.

AStonedRose · Yesterday 12:08

Tarquinosaurus · Yesterday 11:57

Odd that a post in Site Stuff about a now banned trolling poster has morphed into "no you're the mean ones!" because women can no longer trust that men will stay out of women's spaces.

This isn't really how it unfolded. I made the point that it's difficult to adopt the moral high ground when there has been some shitty conduct in the other direction recently. It used to be axiomatic on here (I'm a long-time lurker) but seems to have ceased to be.

The almost-universal response was that these things never happened. That's an untruth, and it invites a response.

The irony (among others) is that I agree that the poster subject of the thread is a piece of shit. I don't think men can change sex, I think there's unfortunately a minority of men posing as trans who are sexual predators.

MyAmpleSheep · Yesterday 12:10

The regulars either engage, or shrug their shoulders.

You are a regular. If you didn’t report the threads then you shrugged your shoulders. Sitting back and tutting under your breath doesn’t count.

Swipe left for the next trending thread