Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Dear MNHQ, I really would prefer not to see this advert …

98 replies

Edmontine · 04/09/2025 07:57

How can you, in all conscience, allow this to appear on the site?

Please make it stop.

Dear MNHQ, I really would prefer not to see this advert …
OP posts:
TheMimsy · 04/09/2025 09:15

i too find this racist and wonder why Mumsnet can’t have better vetting if ad companies. Some of the ads have been too sexual, racist or if a really poor quality and looked like something I could have done better using Microsoft Paint whilst blindfolded.

Bumblebee72 · 04/09/2025 09:17

GrannyAchingsShepherdsHut · 04/09/2025 08:26

They've used skin tone colours for the heads.

They aren't skin tone colours, they are a scale of red. It is peoples subconscious racism that then equates dark red with brown/black and light red with white.

CoffeePlse · 04/09/2025 09:26

Bumblebee72 · 04/09/2025 09:17

They aren't skin tone colours, they are a scale of red. It is peoples subconscious racism that then equates dark red with brown/black and light red with white.

Oh come on.

Funsummerfun · 04/09/2025 09:28

Bumblebee72 · 04/09/2025 09:17

They aren't skin tone colours, they are a scale of red. It is peoples subconscious racism that then equates dark red with brown/black and light red with white.

I mean another word for 'light red' is pink, which is often used to depict white skinned people in illustration etc.

FigurativelyDying · 04/09/2025 09:29

Bumblebee72 · 04/09/2025 09:17

They aren't skin tone colours, they are a scale of red. It is peoples subconscious racism that then equates dark red with brown/black and light red with white.

What an absolutely offensive answer. Tone deaf as well as blind

Aniedu · 04/09/2025 09:31

GrannyAchingsShepherdsHut · 04/09/2025 08:26

They've used skin tone colours for the heads.

It looks red to me. And it doesn’t go in darkest to lightest either?

Thisgrillisonfire · 04/09/2025 09:36

It’s totally red on my phone - maybe people see different colours?

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 04/09/2025 09:37

Lifejigsaw · 04/09/2025 08:23

i agree it’s offensive and needs dealing with but there is a fundamental misunderstanding on this site as to how adverts are ‘picked’. Mumsnet sells ad space to ad organisations, not individual companies. They’ll have agreements on what types of ads are/aren’t ok but something like this will have been vetted by the company not Mumsnet.

Mumsnet sells ad space to low-tier ad networks that have repeatedly delivered shitty ads, viruses, drive-by downloads, browser hijacks and other scams.

But rather than stop doing business with those shitty ad networks, Mumsnet prefers to keep taking their money and letting its users deal with the fallout.

SidekickSylvia · 04/09/2025 09:37

I've just checked and it's red on my lap top, but dark to light on my phone. How strange. So it must depend what device you're on.

Whiskeyandkittens · 04/09/2025 09:45

If you have the link to the ad you can report it to the Advertising Standards Agency.

ShesTheAlbatross · 04/09/2025 09:50

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 04/09/2025 09:37

Mumsnet sells ad space to low-tier ad networks that have repeatedly delivered shitty ads, viruses, drive-by downloads, browser hijacks and other scams.

But rather than stop doing business with those shitty ad networks, Mumsnet prefers to keep taking their money and letting its users deal with the fallout.

Yes the adverts on MN are almost all bad. Not like this one, this is an exceptionally awful example. But so many of them seem like dodgy links I’d never click on.

SprayWhiteDung · 04/09/2025 09:51

Bumblebee72 · 04/09/2025 09:17

They aren't skin tone colours, they are a scale of red. It is peoples subconscious racism that then equates dark red with brown/black and light red with white.

However you interpret the actual colours (and how your device displays them), it's still abundantly clear that the obvious suggestion is that the darker your skin colour is, the more stupid; and the lighter your skin colour, the smarter.

Even if people with very dark skin do the test and attain the 'genius' level as decreed by this test, it's effectively 'promoting' them to 'white intelligence' level, as though they somehow needed this.

Darwin believed something akin to this: that the paler your skin, the more evolved you were - so presumably also the more intelligent you would be. It's 2025; we really should have moved on from such horrible and ridiculously absurd prejudice by now.

Not that it makes a difference, but my own skin colour happens to be most similar to the person on the very right end of the scale. In no way whatsoever does that make me a genius, though!

Birthoptionss · 04/09/2025 09:52

I’m on my phone and it’s red/burgundy shades for me and so racism would never have come to mind. I suppose it is different depending on screen settings? Light settings?

marshmallowfinder · 04/09/2025 09:53

It's shades of red. Nothing to do with skin, obviously. Christ, people will jump on anything and scream racism. It is nothing of the sort. Plus, it's not depicting skin but the contents of a head.

C8H10N4O2 · 04/09/2025 10:07

Lifejigsaw · 04/09/2025 08:23

i agree it’s offensive and needs dealing with but there is a fundamental misunderstanding on this site as to how adverts are ‘picked’. Mumsnet sells ad space to ad organisations, not individual companies. They’ll have agreements on what types of ads are/aren’t ok but something like this will have been vetted by the company not Mumsnet.

Its irrelevant who does the picking - MN subscribe to the service, set the parameters and publish the results. You can outsource work, the accountability remains with the company.

Ads on MN is a long running bug bear, both the wholly inappropriate content of some and the accessibility issues caused by others.

I’ve never seen a thread here which achieves anything other than “please report the individual ads” whack-a-mole style.

I genuinely do not experience the level of ad caused problems on other sites which I see on MN without an ad blocker. On the whole, people only go to the trouble of using ad blockers where they experience a problem as a result of the ads.

ohsobroody · 04/09/2025 10:11

BCBird · 04/09/2025 08:19

At first glance I thought what's the issue. I soon realised what you meant. Offensive

Edited

Same!! I haven’t had enough coffee yet clearly as it hasn’t occurred to me it was anything other than a daft IQ thing… then I noticed the skin tones 😵‍💫😬

is it MN that manage them though? I always thought they were personalised to you and your browsing history. Mine are currently all lawn mower related 👀

Elbowpatch · 04/09/2025 10:12

Shades of red to me too, and not in order either.

I had to read the comments to see what all the fuss was about.

Edmontine · 04/09/2025 10:14

This is exactly why I had an ad-blocker - for this site. Because I didn’t want to be subjected to this sort of thing. Or to have apologists explaining to me (me!) when and where I am allowed to experience racism, and when and where I am permitted to express my reaction to it.

OP posts:
freshpyjamas · 04/09/2025 10:14

It’s red to pink! No idea what everyone is getting offended for.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 04/09/2025 10:17

I've looked at it on my phone and on the website (I don't use the app) and it's very obviously dark brown to light pink in both places. I don't know where people are getting red from.

VerySwettyBetty · 04/09/2025 10:17

It doesn't matter whether the darker tone is red or not. The image shows gradation of darker tone to lighter tone, correlating with "increased" IQ. Totally unacceptable.

@MNHQ

Teajenny7 · 04/09/2025 10:21

Funsummerfun · 04/09/2025 09:28

I mean another word for 'light red' is pink, which is often used to depict white skinned people in illustration etc.

Why red?
How does that make a Native American feel?
People from the First Nations were commonly referred to as 'Red Skins' in the past.

Bumblebee72 · 04/09/2025 10:21

FigurativelyDying · 04/09/2025 09:29

What an absolutely offensive answer. Tone deaf as well as blind

You are clearly looking for things to be offended by.

C8H10N4O2 · 04/09/2025 10:22

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 04/09/2025 10:17

I've looked at it on my phone and on the website (I don't use the app) and it's very obviously dark brown to light pink in both places. I don't know where people are getting red from.

It comes from a determination not to see.

Teajenny7 · 04/09/2025 10:23

Teajenny7 · 04/09/2025 10:21

Why red?
How does that make a Native American feel?
People from the First Nations were commonly referred to as 'Red Skins' in the past.

Sorry tagged wrong poster.