Hello MN Towers.

[kiskidee]

Can you pretty please add ticky boxes for 'in the news' and 'am i being unreasonable'?

even if just for a while.

sending up a box of chocolate truffles even if you say 'no'.

ticky boxes like the 'no buying or selling' one.

And for postnatal/antenatal.....I am getting abit bored of the April 2007 competative thread titles...

yes me too
dull

and jpsph

move on guys

ands wwws boot ccamp - glas oyu are still fat

and fratns fruit hting
ditto

" no fruit no ftties no freaks"
iwant

Add them for everything!

What on earth os "jpsph"?

Joseph
thos folk unnerve me

its oen show
get over it oyu nutters

Yes indeed, whether it be council houses or tick boxes, our aim is to give the people what they want, and then sell to the highest bidder. [evil cackle]

Yes we need Mumsnet 'a la carte'.

lurve your soh, justine.

now ticky boxes please.

[and i got a heavy handbag too.]

slight hijack, SlightlyMadSweden, what is competitive about the April thread title? It's usually me that starts them, I'm about to start another, and really wasn't aware that there was anything competative about them, if I know what it is you don't like I will endeavour to avoid it

Can I have a tick box for "threads started by people who haven't a clue wtf has been said on other threads but don't like the response to it, even if that response happens to be intelligent, measured and reasonable, but just because they either don't like it or don't like some of the posters' names they've seen attached to the posts they're objecting to, without knowing what they're on about anyway in the first place" please?

(posted by Hunker, as VVV, because I can't be arsed to get unbanned)

HUNKER GET UNBANNED!!!!!

what?

Nopediddlyope

(posted by Hunker, as VVV, because I can't be arsed to get unbanned)

Can we have a box to tick that stops us getting posts from people who's automatic response to a dissenting thread is to accuse the poster of class bias, or hating newbies, of being in a clique?

I'd lurve one of those

Oi Cod, we are not fat, we're GORGEOUS I TELL YOU!!!

And a 'No Fuckwits' button
and 'without Tories'
Ta

It just appears that the most recent has to outdo the previous...I don't mean competitive against any other group, although I have noticed other groups are trying to live up to your high standards.

Us on teh April 2006 don't seem to have that problem as our title is "Soon they will all be 1" and the thread still only has 350ish posts....we are not very talkitive

I didn't mean to single you out as the only ones....its just yours that comes to mind as you seem to have a new therad every week (not that there is a problem with that either)

Can someone pass that ladder so I can climb out of this wopping great big hole ????

a No humourless fuckers button would be good too

Can you delete the "include special needs" as an option.

I'm not going to start to explain the politics but I think it is offensive to assume that issues around people with special needs should be able to excluded.

I asked to be banned ages ago.

And not one of you fuckers missed me

(posted by Hunker, as VVV, because I can't be arsed to get unbanned)

Hunker got herself banned, allegedly to spend less time here, and now she just posts under VVV's login and confuses us all!

And can we have one for 'No Attention Seeking Flounces"
I missed you hunker, had any sleep lately?