So now we can get threads deleted, because they have served their purpose????

[00100001]

Huh??

Yeah

What she said

Once I have my answer @MNHQ please do delete the thread, as it will have served its purpose?

deletions here are a joke, it seems to me

post and be damned I say!

Any idea what the thread was about?

That is a random one.

Wasnt this a begging thread requesting chocolates or something similar?

If so I assume some gullible poster sent her what was asked for.

Eh?! What on earth was the thread about?!

Hmmmm

Extra suspicious on a begging thread, makes it sound as if they are successful on MN.

This one doesn’t even pretend it’s for a reason - just says it’s been deleted on behalf of the op.

T’is getting just a bit farcial now!

I've noticed over the last year or so that reasons for deletion have often been very flimsy and not at all in line with what MNHQ states in TGs.

Any chance of re-writing that bit in TG so that it accurately reflects this new way of handling deletions?

MN TGs

1. We decide on impulse whether to delete a post.

I see. So it's delete on demand now.

On any given day 50% of my threads I’m on looks like this

Really ?

Oh FGS all getting abit silly now

Can we just have our own delete button now, would save a lot of emails

To be fair, is my resting face.

The 'on behalf of the op' picture above was the concert goer whose sister and friends left her to get the train home alone while they drove.

It’s fucking ridiculous at the moment. There’s no point in posting on half these threads.

MNHQ are notoriously inconsistent with deletions. From really horrendous stuff they will let stand to ridiculous cop out deletion messages for OPs who didn’t get “aww hugs hun” responses and went crying to miss.

I thought it might have been a joke by MNHQ...

That’s farcical.

If people start a thread they dont want to hang around why dont they just post in 30 days only?