Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thoughts on MNHQ's response to the Spartacus thread

991 replies

OlennasWimple · 30/08/2016 22:23

As the Spartacus thread is about to reach capacity, here's a new thread to discuss MNHQ's response to the issues raised on that thread and in a few other places over the last week or so.

is lesphobic to insist that a lesbian likes penis. Feck off with that shite.
Add message | Report | Message poster KateMumsnet (MNHQ) Tue 30-Aug-16 21:08:00
Hello all

Thanks for all your input on this - we've been listening and thinking hard.

Couple of quick points to clear up: it's actually not the case that people have been banned solely for misgendering - it will have been part of a broader discussion here about whether that poster is able to stick to the rules generally.

We must admit to being slightly taken aback at being cast, by some, as the evil slave-baiting Roman republic in this grin - as lots of you have pointed out, Mumsnet remains one of the few places where these issues can be discussed at all. It would have been much, much easier (both in terms of the resource and the toll on our moderators' sanity!) to shut down the debate as others have done, but instead we are working hard to find a realistic balance between free speech and being a space which welcomes everyone.

From our perspective, the whole issue is pretty much covered by our Talk Guidelines. If people are using sex-at-birth pronouns to provoke, inflame, or belittle, then that's against the rules and will usually have to go. If it happens as part of an otherwise broadly respectful (even if heated) discussion, we look at it in that context and take a view.

Some of you have pointed out a disjunct between allowing posts which mirror mainstream scientific thinking, while asking MNers not to describe a trans woman as 'he'. We can see your point on this,and also accept that there is a fair amount of dodgy stuff on the trans side that can rightly be described as anti-feminist and regressive - but what we'd ask you to think about is the impact on the parent who's not an activist, and likely isn't even posting, but whose adult child is transitioning, or who is doing so themselves. Would they feel belittled, mocked or attacked? Would they think Mumsnet was not for them? If so, we're going to have to remove it. It's a fudge, but it's the best we can do at this stage.

In all but the most extreme headline-grabbing cases, we do think it's possible to debate the core principles without referring to individuals in a way which will cause hurt. Most of you have said that when talking to a trans person face-to-face you wouldn't insist on using birth pronouns or names - and generally, on this and other issues, we encourage people to treat others with the same courtesy they'd use in real life. For every MNer who posts on a thread there are likely to be ten who are lurking - statistically, some of those will be trans or love someone who is, and we need to take account of them too.

We hope that makes our thinking a bit clearer overall. Do continue to tell us your thoughts - it's probably unrealistic to think that this issue will be quickly resolved here or across society as a whole, but it would be brilliant if MN could be part of the solution, we think.

MNHQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
noeffingidea · 09/09/2016 18:53

bambambini my son is 19 and has no problem with being gendercritical. No problem at all.
He was one of those little boys who loved pink glittery shit and all the rest of it but is now grateful that no one told him he must be a girl or dragged him off to therapy or pumped him full of hormones.
The best thing we can do for our children is to ground them in the real world not some fantasy bubble.

zeeboo · 09/09/2016 19:29

This is a quote from the fuckwad who 'invented' the autogynaephilia typology.
If you are hitching your wagons to him, then I'm happy to hitch mine to MNHQs and to transwomen, who are women, born into the wrong body. Those of us born female and who identify as female don't have to be selfish with womanhood. The bile on this thread "the Y chromosome begs to differ, they aren't women" is just disgusting.

"The analogous term autoandrophilia refers to a person assigned female at birth who is sexually aroused by the thought or image of being a man.[34] It was classified as a type of transvestic fetishism in a proposed revision to the DSM-5[35] but not included in the final version. Less work has been done on autoandrophilia,[36] and in an interview with Vicee^, Blanchard stated "I proposed it simply in order not to be accused of sexism, because there are all these women who want to say women can rape too, women can be pedophiles too, women can be exhibitionists too. It’s a perverse expression of feminism, and so, I thought, let me jump the gun on this. I don’t think the phenomenon even exists."[37]"

There we have it. Your buddy Blanchard says it's a sexual fetish and also that women, bless their little aprons can't be pedophiles (sic) or rape.

Atenco · 09/09/2016 19:44

Those of us born female and who identify as female don't have to be selfish with womanhood

I'm not selfish with womanhood, I happily share it with 3.7 billion other people.

WinchesterWoman · 09/09/2016 19:46

So what's the new definition of womanhood zee boo? One that we can all share?

venusinscorpio · 09/09/2016 19:46

I don't "identify" as female. I am female. Men are not.

venusinscorpio · 09/09/2016 19:49

Do you think it's beyond the realms of possibility that men could ever ever want to dress up and fantasise about themselves as female as a sexual fetish? No one is saying that applies to all trans women. Just some.

WaitrosePigeon · 09/09/2016 19:54

Trans women are not women. How many times does it have to be said.

HairyLittlePoet · 09/09/2016 19:58

zeeboo, women can't rape.

Have you read any of Miranda's posts? I'm just wondering how you square the experience of a transexual who has written about autogynaephilia with your belief that it doesn't exist. Or perhaps you might read the writings of the various women partners who have had to deal with MTT husbands and write poignantly about this sexual aspect of transition.

Blanchard's theory wasn't invented out of thin air, and the evidence for it is very compelling if you choose to listen to those with direct experience of it.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 09/09/2016 20:01

I am selfish with my 5'2 hood. I exclude people who are 6 foot or indeed, even 5'4 from it.
You tie yourself in knots and ignore reality just to be nice if you want to Zeeboo, I won't be joining you.

FirstShinyRobe · 09/09/2016 20:07

I have a woman's soul. Very grateful to have been put in the correct body. Who decided that, I wonder? Or was it just chance?

Or is that a load of guff?

HairyLittlePoet · 09/09/2016 20:15

Those of us born female and who identify as female don't have to be selfish with womanhood.

Can you tell me please, what, in your opinion are those of us who are born female and who DON'T 'identify' as female. Those of us who reject the whole ideology of gender identity the same way atheists reject religion.

Wanting to group everyone by 'gender' is akin to demanding everyone be assigned or choose a religion, allowing no room for a complete rejection of religious ideology.

We no more identify as a gender than we identify as a religion.

What are we? If "woman" is to be redefined what the hell is the redefinition that includes me and millions of other women who think gender is an ideology that we don't accept?

PlentyOfPubeGardens · 09/09/2016 20:28

Autogynaephilia is a sexual fetish. So would autoandrophilia be if it was a thing, but there's little evidence for it. There's nothing wrong with having a sexual fetish as long as it's not inflicted on others without consent.

IME quite a few transwomen are motivated at least in part by autogynaephilia. The transwomen I know are probably not a representative sample (they are mostly late transitioners) so I wouldn't want to put figures on it, but two transwomen on one of the 'bullshit' threads said they thought a majority of transwomen were motivated by this fetish.

Under current UK law rape involves a penis. If a 'woman' with a penis commits rape it's a massive fucking clue that that person is male (sorry MNHQ). Women can commit sexual assault but it really isn't much of a thing. Ditto paedophilia.

Those of us born female and who identify as female don't have to be selfish with womanhood.

You say this like being female is some special lovely treat Hmm

Thoughts on MNHQ's response to the Spartacus thread
FeedMeAndTellMeImPretty · 09/09/2016 21:29

I'd quite like a penis, they seem like fun. If I could go and get myself one and still keep my boobs, to which I'm quite partial, and wear jeans and flat shoes instead of dresses and heels, I would not be a man.

LastGirlOnTheLeft · 09/09/2016 21:39

No I would hate one. They look ludicrous and they would get in the way. DH does this dance naked when he is drunk about twice each year (our birthdays), where he puts a pillow case behind his penis and starts moving and shaking!!!! It is soooooo funny.:..but he does it because he KNOWS penises really are the most comical thing on earth!!!

NO WAY would I want one of those!!!!

LastGirlOnTheLeft · 09/09/2016 21:40

Sorry to lower the tone, by the way!!!Blush

WorkingItOutAsIGo · 09/09/2016 21:41

Zeebo I am trying to understand your argument and am happy to debate with you. I am not talking about the autogynephilia point but your key point in the first paragraph.

You refer to the 'disgusting' argument that possessing the Y chromosome means someone isn't a woman. Can you expand? We have all been discussing basic biology XY=male XX=female. Why is that disgusting? What is your definition of woman? Very happy to have a debate that is more than just using negative language.

WankingMonkey · 09/09/2016 21:56

zeeboo

What I get from the writing of the 'fucktard' is that he uses the term autoandrophilia simply so there is a term for a woman experiencing the same fetish...if one exists. Where plenty of men with this exist.

Amalfimamma · 09/09/2016 22:08

zeeboo

I want to be Marilyn Monroe. I'm going to have surgery to look like her, change my voice, bleach my hair, dress like her, demand I'm called Marilyn and hunt down a Kennedy to have a steamy affair with.

Thing is though. I may dress, look, speak and behave like her but I will never be her for one simple reason. DNA. If you choose to ignore scientific fact that's your own ignorance, not ours.

Those of us born female and who identify as female don't have to be selfish with womanhood.
Did you really think that through before writing it down? No, didn't think so....................................

CoteDAzur · 09/09/2016 22:27

If autogynephilia is a lie, then what are these?

Prawnofthepatriarchy · 09/09/2016 22:28

Well, zeeboo, your post went down like a lead balloon, didn't it?

Why don't you say something that starts a debate? You could give explaining your position another try? Or were you not planning to stay around?

microferret · 09/09/2016 22:59

People like zeeboo are the reason that the TAs are so hard to take seriously. It's disgusting now to state immutable biological fact?

I think it's more disgusting to reduce womanhood to a mere set of hackneyed stereotypes. I think that a brain-based idea of gender is even more essentialist than one based on biological sex. And I'm immune to attempts to guilt me into thinking otherwise.

Go ahead, call us names - we don't care, we won't stop talking about this, and we aren't interested in the self-righteous ramblings of someone who only came here to insult us under the guise of being progressive.

thebewilderness · 10/09/2016 21:15

There is nothing wrong with your body. The problem is located in your mind as are most fetishes and dysphorias. We do not recommend liposuction to those with anorexia because it is ineffective in treating the problem and in fact exacerbates it. This is also the case with surgical transition.

LauraRoslin · 12/09/2016 01:12

In passing, I note that the XX/XY binary and the vagina/penis binary don't quite match up in all cases.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XX_male_syndrome

CoteDAzur · 12/09/2016 06:26

That is a DISORDER.

We are a bipedal species but some people are born without feet.

Googling obscure disorders won't help you understand what is being talked about here.

TwatbadgingCuntfuckery · 12/09/2016 07:01

Laura - those are rare cases. Just like intersex people are rare and they often know that they have that disorder. With that XX disorder the presentation is male. they carry male DNA. Which is why they have a penis and testes.

What we are discussing are genetically 'normal' people. Who have decided to change their gender stereotype. They claim they are mAle or female using pseudoscience about 'lady brains' ' assigned at birth' neither of which are true. There are other theories.

Lady brain theory is neurobollocks
Being assigned at birth implies sex is a choice. It is not.

They are distinct groups. we must not mix them up.

Swipe left for the next trending thread