Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thoughts on MNHQ's response to the Spartacus thread

991 replies

OlennasWimple · 30/08/2016 22:23

As the Spartacus thread is about to reach capacity, here's a new thread to discuss MNHQ's response to the issues raised on that thread and in a few other places over the last week or so.

is lesphobic to insist that a lesbian likes penis. Feck off with that shite.
Add message | Report | Message poster KateMumsnet (MNHQ) Tue 30-Aug-16 21:08:00
Hello all

Thanks for all your input on this - we've been listening and thinking hard.

Couple of quick points to clear up: it's actually not the case that people have been banned solely for misgendering - it will have been part of a broader discussion here about whether that poster is able to stick to the rules generally.

We must admit to being slightly taken aback at being cast, by some, as the evil slave-baiting Roman republic in this grin - as lots of you have pointed out, Mumsnet remains one of the few places where these issues can be discussed at all. It would have been much, much easier (both in terms of the resource and the toll on our moderators' sanity!) to shut down the debate as others have done, but instead we are working hard to find a realistic balance between free speech and being a space which welcomes everyone.

From our perspective, the whole issue is pretty much covered by our Talk Guidelines. If people are using sex-at-birth pronouns to provoke, inflame, or belittle, then that's against the rules and will usually have to go. If it happens as part of an otherwise broadly respectful (even if heated) discussion, we look at it in that context and take a view.

Some of you have pointed out a disjunct between allowing posts which mirror mainstream scientific thinking, while asking MNers not to describe a trans woman as 'he'. We can see your point on this,and also accept that there is a fair amount of dodgy stuff on the trans side that can rightly be described as anti-feminist and regressive - but what we'd ask you to think about is the impact on the parent who's not an activist, and likely isn't even posting, but whose adult child is transitioning, or who is doing so themselves. Would they feel belittled, mocked or attacked? Would they think Mumsnet was not for them? If so, we're going to have to remove it. It's a fudge, but it's the best we can do at this stage.

In all but the most extreme headline-grabbing cases, we do think it's possible to debate the core principles without referring to individuals in a way which will cause hurt. Most of you have said that when talking to a trans person face-to-face you wouldn't insist on using birth pronouns or names - and generally, on this and other issues, we encourage people to treat others with the same courtesy they'd use in real life. For every MNer who posts on a thread there are likely to be ten who are lurking - statistically, some of those will be trans or love someone who is, and we need to take account of them too.

We hope that makes our thinking a bit clearer overall. Do continue to tell us your thoughts - it's probably unrealistic to think that this issue will be quickly resolved here or across society as a whole, but it would be brilliant if MN could be part of the solution, we think.

MNHQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 22:45

Because we talk about it :/ they don't know why people can't do whatever they want, without feeling they must pretend to be something they aren't.

Bambambini · 06/09/2016 22:48

Ok, can't say i've had this trans conversation with my kids. How old are yours?

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 22:50

Can't link but can help you google

Washington Times george soros transgender
Open society foundation us program national society for transgender equality
Hang on

JedRambosteen · 06/09/2016 22:52

I was discussing the reaction to Germaine Greer's Newsnight interview last autumn in the car with DH & was asked about it by DS1
(Why are they never really listening to their ipods when they ought to be?). What an interesting conversation that ended up being...

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 22:53

Late teens with trans person at school

I was always to busy to enforce any gender norms, they always did what they wanted including a heck of a lot of stuff that now, people would latch on to

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 22:54

Ha Jed the trouble is the young ones still believe in magic

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 22:55

I mean a trans class colleague, not my ones

PortiaCastis · 06/09/2016 22:58

Funded fuckin funded!!!
I've just seen brave men and women go out to save others and they volunteer to save others with equipment funded by CHARITY
This world is fucked up completely

Bambambini · 06/09/2016 22:58

I'd be worried my kids wentboff half cocked spouting gender critical ideas - that they would be eviserated.

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 23:00

Yes well it's fear that allows insanity to prevail

Bambambini · 06/09/2016 23:01

I honestly dont feel confident or safe supporting the gender critical viewpoint in public. I definitely wouldn't want my kids risking it.

JedRambosteen · 06/09/2016 23:06

Was that aimed at me Bambambini? If so, you needn't worry. It went very much along the line we take about religion, that people have differing belief systems/views & that whilst we might not always agree with others' viewpoints, we should respect that they sincerely believe them & be civil in our dealings with them. It was a looooong time ago in terms of how things have moved on with this agenda. We might have a different conversation next time it comes up, because I'm seeing very little respect or civility towards women from TAs.

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 23:11

They're bright enough. They don't have to yell about it. And the're so open minded and tolerant. Sceptical voice here and there and it all adds up.

There's no coherency to the transactivist argument so momentum will be lost. I don't think the new laws will be enacted. The mm massive could almost guarantee that. Imagine the debate in the commons. And the running minute by Monte commentary as miners disabuse the MPs of whatever misconceived bilge they come out with in an effort be on point. MN is like a crowd sourced informational goldmine, shot through with evidence and most importantly, killer logic.

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 23:13

Minute by minute not Monte
And mners not miners
Dear oh lor oh dear

JedRambosteen · 06/09/2016 23:15

You been on the gin this evening, Winchester?

ErrolTheDragon · 06/09/2016 23:18

I think her autocorrect has been on the gin! But it was comprehensible. Smile

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 23:27

It on an old tablet that won't even allow fuck without a special blessing

Bambambini · 06/09/2016 23:27

Jer - no, not aimed at you,. But i do want some of what Winchester has been drinking. And outside Mumsnet, I doubt anyone really cares or take much note of what a small niche of Mn thinks. The press and general public don't seem to hold us in that high a regard.

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 23:31

Bambini you're so wrong! Grin. Wishful thinking Wink

WinchesterWoman · 06/09/2016 23:32

Ps Portia I am with you.makes your stomach turn.

StatisticallyChallenged · 06/09/2016 23:57

I love the person who states

"#IfMenHadPeriods is awfully cissexist. I know MANY men who not only have periods but give birth on a daily basis."

Wow, so these magic bleeding men have also accelerated pregnancy to a 1 day process? If I could do that I might not have paused for a very long time at 1!

WankingMonkey · 07/09/2016 00:01

Wow, so these magic bleeding men have also accelerated pregnancy to a 1 day process? If I could do that I might not have paused for a very long time at 1!

WankingMonkey · 07/09/2016 00:01

FFS

Grin was meant to be added on that. Faily me

StatisticallyChallenged · 07/09/2016 00:09

Just trying to explain some of this to DH, who surprisingly is getting it pretty much instantly. DH is one of those guys who is what i would think of as instinctively feminist - he just doesn't see women as being in any way shape or form less than him or any other guy. But he's not someone who has read up or researched or discussed it IYSWIM?

But anyway, I was explaining "If men had periods" and read him a couple of the tweets, then mentioned that you get the same shit with people objecting to FGM as a term. His response was all sorts of WTF, so I explained it is because it's thought to be excluding people who don't identify as female even if they have female body parts. His response:

"The people doing the cutting don't give a fuck how they identify though, they're doing it because they see a female. They don't stop and ask if this labia identifies as male and go "oh, ok, this is a male labia I won't cut this one then"

JAPABiamtheonewhoknocks · 07/09/2016 02:21

"The people doing the cutting don't give a fuck how they identify though, they're doing it because they see a female. They don't stop and ask if this labia identifies as male and go "oh, ok, this is a male labia I won't cut this one then"

This proves what though? Since when are the people who FGM the arbritrators of what is what? Transmen are not men because those who FGM treat all persons with a vagina the same way?

There always will be people who treat others in accordance with the groupings they place them into, which may or may not align with the person's own self-ID. Those who subscribe to the one drop rule, those who assume any man who is camp or effeminate is gay, or those who just treat all XX-chromosomed individuals the same way, may adversly treat those they place into the groups. Why should such people be the arbritators of what people are.