Blow me that anyone be offended ar being assigned labels, once again , by 1 people born male - however they identify - and their collaborators , and 2 insist that this label - which actually insinuates that women are content with the abuse the gender "woman" has piled on them ,via their biology - is harmless.
Forgive thus uppity woman pointing out that this is highly ironic - issuing as it does from people who insist that only the labels they assign themselves - must ever be used .
Both ways it cannot be had cupcakes . No.
As the ever on point R R-Cooper once remarked, if gender is a spectrum, what is trans ?
By extension, who is "cis"?
As to this piffle about it being a way to distinguish women from trans woman, I can only posit that this is a blatantly obvious attempt to linguistically erase the term "transwoman" in relation to woman , and replace it with " woman" and "ciswoman".
Again nope.
Finally " assigned"? No. Doctors and midwives do not cut the umbilical cord , then blindfold, reach into a tombola and see whether a pink or blue ball emerges .
Triple nope. They note biological sex .