DBF had done what MNHQ asked of her, she had 'toned down' her posts, a lot. She called TLES a liar. Calling someone who has been proven to be lying a liar is really not like shooting your mouth off randomly at a poster asking a question about rehoming their dog. She had been warned about 'lecturing' as MNHQ calls it, about being 'shouty and opinionated' this is different. Had she posted this on the relationships board (where she also offered great advice) or any other board it would most likely have been ignored. She hasn't been banned for doing what she was given the warnings about, she has been banned for something different.
If a child is on a final warning for pushing kids on the playground, then is rude to a teacher - is it OK to punish them as if they have pushed another child in the playground or do you punish them like any other child that had been rude to the teacher? IMO that is the question.
Add message | Report | Message poster
GalaxyWeaverWed 09-Nov-11 13:57:25
but chipping, she didnt just call her a liar.. it was the whole "You are a liar, foolish and a disgrace, not just for what you are doing to this dog but for trying to discredit someone who works her arse off to save them. You appall me and I am furious..." that got her banned.
That should not have got her banned. All of it was true.
Rhubarb - Vallhala/DBF had been banned before, yes. I'm not sure under which name. But if you are asking was she banned under Vallhala but posting under DBF then no, she wasn't. She was no longer banned and she was open about her namechange.