Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

VAT and removal of 50% cap on scholarships

115 replies

lovepenguin · 29/05/2024 11:37

I'm not in favour of Labour's policy on adding VAT to private schools. However I do wonder whether the private schools no longer have to adhere to the 50% cap on scholarships from the charity commission, if they lose the charity status. Will scholarships be more generous?

OP posts:
newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 19:57

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 19:47

I do agree with you on the government being to blame massively, but I still strongly disagree regarding private education - it should be the same for all children regardless of background - state schools should be aesthetically pleasing nice environments, small numbers in a class etc. - why is this only for those that can pay! There should be no need for private schools.

Because it is impossible to provide such a service for the population at large. Simply impossible. And not just in the UK. Countries have to sort Healthcare, defense, pandemic preparedness etc. No sane government (Labour, Tory, Green whatever) will use those funds to provide fancy aesthetics for all children in a country of 66million people. Not least because those are nice to have for sure but do not influence academic outcome. They likely do result in more rounded and exposed kids but parents can provide that themselves if a priority. These are our kids - so they are our responsibility. The government certainly needs to do more but private school standard for all is not pragmatic

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 19:57

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 19:52

Because !!! State schools have to be paid by taxes. We have high high benefits draining the system, we have so many things draining the system. Billion £ earners not taxed properly, dodgy govt giving contracts to their mates but you want to penalise the junior doctors who can just scoot afford private, etc? Nothing positive will come of it except the glee of everyone trying not to drown in the sh** filled pond

I agree, taxes need to be raised too. But the fundamental fact is the system is not fair and needs addressing and VAT on private fees is a step in the right direction in my opinion. Personally, I think Labour should be more bold and find a way to abolish them but I happy for this as a start.

Interesting you point out the high benefits - most people on benefits are in work!

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 19:57

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 19:56

They are already cutting bursary places. This creates a massive elitist issue that currently has grey areas. My nephew secured a bursary - no father and social housing. He is talented at sport- will the govt support him on that at £5 per head? Two schools said no bursaries due to predicted vat.

There are many benefitting like him, but not for long. If you then say why can’t all benefit? Well because they might not be ultra talented naturally in an area.

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:00

If a kid is going to do well, they will. If the family are struggling to understand why they need education, work etc , then no amount of money is going to propel them into stardom - you know that!!!

Another76543 · 01/06/2024 20:01

Artsyblartsymum · 01/06/2024 19:52

This argument is quite depressing and been going on since I became a parent. It's fine to have choice and if you want to send your kids to private school, that's ok. However, the majority of kids in this country go to state schools and if we want to have a better country and thriving economy etc it needs to be invested in and if that means raising VAT, if Labour do that, on private schools so be it. Private schools are businesses and like anything, if they pass that cost onto their customers, the consumer will be able to decide if it's worth it for them or not. The percentage of shared grounds and resources argument is a drop in the ocean in terms of charitable impact on the state sector. I never feel that argument sticks. The current government has not invested in the state sector. I want a government that will make those kids, who are the majority of society, a priority when it comes to education, not an afterthought.

That’s the point though. Adding VAT to private school fees isn’t going to raise enough to fund investment in the state sector.

Even the Director of the IFS (the organisation which published the report which Labour are basing their figures on) has said “But don't be fooled into thinking this is going to make any real difference to the amount of money available for public services.”

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:02

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 19:57

I agree, taxes need to be raised too. But the fundamental fact is the system is not fair and needs addressing and VAT on private fees is a step in the right direction in my opinion. Personally, I think Labour should be more bold and find a way to abolish them but I happy for this as a start.

Interesting you point out the high benefits - most people on benefits are in work!

Edited

Earning low wages? Did you ever not inform them as a teacher that if they work hard at their grades, it gives them choices? Including not taking jobs that pay low???

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 20:02

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 19:57

Because it is impossible to provide such a service for the population at large. Simply impossible. And not just in the UK. Countries have to sort Healthcare, defense, pandemic preparedness etc. No sane government (Labour, Tory, Green whatever) will use those funds to provide fancy aesthetics for all children in a country of 66million people. Not least because those are nice to have for sure but do not influence academic outcome. They likely do result in more rounded and exposed kids but parents can provide that themselves if a priority. These are our kids - so they are our responsibility. The government certainly needs to do more but private school standard for all is not pragmatic

I disagree we should be aspirational for all our children! If the political will was there it could happen. Now would be a good time to do this especially as so many schools need rebuilding due to the RAAC scandal - we could definitely make a start!

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 20:04

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:02

Earning low wages? Did you ever not inform them as a teacher that if they work hard at their grades, it gives them choices? Including not taking jobs that pay low???

Are you being deliberately facetious...

Artsyblartsymum · 01/06/2024 20:06

Adding VAT is something. It's a step in the right direction and certainly better than where it is now.

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:06

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 01:42

7% is over 35,000 children, 1% is 5000 children. That is a lot of families with kids getting luxury education discounted or free each year. Did not realise it was that much

Apart from VAT, fees were rising disproportionately anyway and many where being priced out. And with inflation/COL etc - I am sure many parents start to feel less generous.

Hopefully, the economy grows and people prosper and therefore are not only able to pay VAT but also continue with the bursaries. If one is lucky enough to be wealthy, it does feel really good to know your fees are not only supporting your child, but many others (via VAT, paying for an unused state place and subsidising bursary places).

Any incoming government needs to have a plan to support state schools, where the majority go and this won't touch the sides. I really hope the population will hold them to account cos the majority of private parents will keep their kids in and their kids will still enjoy a better education than the average state kid - unless the government really prioritises education and funds it properly. If most state schools are excellent, there would be no need or very little need to pay and that would be the real existential threat to private schools

Is tooth decay down to school’s fault? Is not knowing what food to buy down to schools fault? Is not caring about not studying down r school? Not getting enough sleep? Not reading enough? Not playing an instrument, not watching a child’s nutrition? All down to school? Knowing why work matters? Fixed by giving an extra £5 a head? Well —- I reckon the thinkers will say, hang on this is billions and billions to solve. Why are labour saying it is all sorted with 1 billion?

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:08

British parents are not the same mentality and upbringing of other countries. You cannot compare apples and oranges.

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:10

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 20:02

I disagree we should be aspirational for all our children! If the political will was there it could happen. Now would be a good time to do this especially as so many schools need rebuilding due to the RAAC scandal - we could definitely make a start!

Edited

The political will is not there because the general population will rightly prioritise many more important over and above aesthetics in schools. And parents (state and private) need to take personal responsibility to provide extras for their own children. We have a low wage economy with many people requiring benefits to survive whilst working - they will not tolerate their benefits being reduced so children can have a plush carpets in class. And rightly so. Parents can and should provide these things for their children. The government's roll is to ensure the quality of core education is solid and comparable to the very best there is out there. People talk about scandi countries all the time - their schools are not luxurious and a larger proportion of the population pays larger proportions of their wages in tax. Private parents should pay VAT - no problems there. But real change will come when everyone realises we will all need to do our bit. Not just the 'rich'

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:10

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 20:04

Are you being deliberately facetious...

Edited

I disagree. It will disproportionately affect those who are on the low middle scales. And have zero impact . Let’s bet our salary on how it impacts our classroom?

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:12

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:10

The political will is not there because the general population will rightly prioritise many more important over and above aesthetics in schools. And parents (state and private) need to take personal responsibility to provide extras for their own children. We have a low wage economy with many people requiring benefits to survive whilst working - they will not tolerate their benefits being reduced so children can have a plush carpets in class. And rightly so. Parents can and should provide these things for their children. The government's roll is to ensure the quality of core education is solid and comparable to the very best there is out there. People talk about scandi countries all the time - their schools are not luxurious and a larger proportion of the population pays larger proportions of their wages in tax. Private parents should pay VAT - no problems there. But real change will come when everyone realises we will all need to do our bit. Not just the 'rich'

All pay for education - and no not the £50 tax if that, you pay a month for education and many none at all their whole lives.

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:15

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:10

The political will is not there because the general population will rightly prioritise many more important over and above aesthetics in schools. And parents (state and private) need to take personal responsibility to provide extras for their own children. We have a low wage economy with many people requiring benefits to survive whilst working - they will not tolerate their benefits being reduced so children can have a plush carpets in class. And rightly so. Parents can and should provide these things for their children. The government's roll is to ensure the quality of core education is solid and comparable to the very best there is out there. People talk about scandi countries all the time - their schools are not luxurious and a larger proportion of the population pays larger proportions of their wages in tax. Private parents should pay VAT - no problems there. But real change will come when everyone realises we will all need to do our bit. Not just the 'rich'

Totally agreee. My neighbour has not worked since she was 20. Her whole philosophy is that why should she when the rich get everything for free. She absolutely doesn’t see the irony in that. She is not alone in her thinking!!!!

Artsyblartsymum · 01/06/2024 20:17

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:10

The political will is not there because the general population will rightly prioritise many more important over and above aesthetics in schools. And parents (state and private) need to take personal responsibility to provide extras for their own children. We have a low wage economy with many people requiring benefits to survive whilst working - they will not tolerate their benefits being reduced so children can have a plush carpets in class. And rightly so. Parents can and should provide these things for their children. The government's roll is to ensure the quality of core education is solid and comparable to the very best there is out there. People talk about scandi countries all the time - their schools are not luxurious and a larger proportion of the population pays larger proportions of their wages in tax. Private parents should pay VAT - no problems there. But real change will come when everyone realises we will all need to do our bit. Not just the 'rich'

Totally agree with you and I'm so glad you brought up the Scandinavian model. If Britain wants to progress as a nation, it has to invest in the core education for all. And, I will say, there are a lot of great state educators and schools out there doing a fantastic job in buildings with bad carpet and leaking roofs. It needs to be better for all. I'm in total support of Labours idea. It's something.

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:19

Artsyblartsymum · 01/06/2024 20:06

Adding VAT is something. It's a step in the right direction and certainly better than where it is now.

Yes - it will hopefully help a little. For the rest, everyone will need to roll up their sleeves. At least private parents have the opportunity to supplement for their kids. The economy needs to grow so more people can do more for their kids. Any government can only do so much

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 20:20

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:10

The political will is not there because the general population will rightly prioritise many more important over and above aesthetics in schools. And parents (state and private) need to take personal responsibility to provide extras for their own children. We have a low wage economy with many people requiring benefits to survive whilst working - they will not tolerate their benefits being reduced so children can have a plush carpets in class. And rightly so. Parents can and should provide these things for their children. The government's roll is to ensure the quality of core education is solid and comparable to the very best there is out there. People talk about scandi countries all the time - their schools are not luxurious and a larger proportion of the population pays larger proportions of their wages in tax. Private parents should pay VAT - no problems there. But real change will come when everyone realises we will all need to do our bit. Not just the 'rich'

You're missing the point it isn't just simply how schools look. It should not be the lower waged people who get taxed more to fix the system. I am all for a wealth tax to sort this mess out. And some better laws to stop big companies from avoiding tax for starters. Then you might have the political will and public support to make these necessary changes.

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:24

northernerinthesouth2000 · 01/06/2024 20:20

You're missing the point it isn't just simply how schools look. It should not be the lower waged people who get taxed more to fix the system. I am all for a wealth tax to sort this mess out. And some better laws to stop big companies from avoiding tax for starters. Then you might have the political will and public support to make these necessary changes.

You can only tax the 'rich' so much before there is not enough of them to tax. Tax + NI for many is already over 50%. Some in the marginal zone pay over 60%. And the proportion of rich in the UK is tiny and median wages are low. I Lead in the NHS - personal responsibility is extremely low in the UK. Rich companies need to pay but a large proportion of the population will need to pay more in tax to have enough to transform education. Otherwise you will just tinker and the gap will continue to widen. The buck stops with all of us - not some

newmummycwharf1 · 01/06/2024 20:26

And it isn't just how schools look - that is just a simple example. In London, many state schools were I live have similar or marginally better academic results than local private schools but the school experience and rounded experience is still worth paying for

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:30

Artsyblartsymum · 01/06/2024 20:06

Adding VAT is something. It's a step in the right direction and certainly better than where it is now.

Have you ever looked at Christ’s hospital school or Reed’s in Cobham? Or do you only look at harrow and Eton? The former are life changing schools.

TizerorFizz · 01/06/2024 20:39

@Begsthequestion You cannot look back and think things are the same now. I live in a grammar county. DC are tutored like mad to get to the grammars. They don’t always have the brightest dc, they have the overtutoted dc. In my day, we did all the practice at school. Every day. The exam was in March. Now it’s September and parents panic.

TizerorFizz · 01/06/2024 20:46

We are already a highly taxed nation. If we carry on being a place that taxes highly but has poor services, it’s not a place where companies want to invest. Nor have DC it now appears. Sweden has substantial private healthcare and a decentralized public system running alongside it. We cling to the failing NHS.

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:51

So Starmer now stating he is supporting building wealth. Of course all the numpties out there, so so jealous of wealth, want vat added, how dare they have anything, they want money. You see, all of it is about money. Wanting money. But… did they think of that when they were making their choices. Choices to work hard at school, choices how to parent, choices in jobs, whether to bother getting up? But don’t worry, vote Starmer, he’ll make you instantly rich- so he says

Artsyblartsymum · 01/06/2024 20:54

Hatty999 · 01/06/2024 20:30

Have you ever looked at Christ’s hospital school or Reed’s in Cobham? Or do you only look at harrow and Eton? The former are life changing schools.

I have actually and know those schools very well. I know families currently at CH and former students. But, I think kids in Yorkshire, kids in East London, in Devon and Shropshire etc, and up and down the country have a right to quality education from their local state schools. And I'm voting for a government that understands that need for the country. As a society we should want that for all our children not just the select few.