So I have 2 dc, they are bright (not MN standard genius:)) and are well behaved (I give them no choice!! but they are nice kids IMO!).
They go to a primary which on paper is v average but I think is amazing and has kids from a VERY mixed catchment- from million pound houses to v deprived council estates. The local secondary has a simliar catchment They are very switched on re bullying, good parent/teacher relationships and I mainly love it because it is a nice, happy places for my kids to be.
I have always been a big believer that well supported kids from happy homes will do well wherever. I am training as a primary teacher and feel this even more strongly after my experiences at schools.
So why am I letting all the school gate angst make me feel my kids will not be absolutely fine at our local, pretty average (on paper, but who knows in practice?) comprehensive?
My main reservation is that my ds, who is the oldest, is very quiet and bookish- likes music, art, not really into football etc- I'm more worried about bullying, peer pressure etc than academics. Also, our primary is on the border for 4 local authorities which means the kids do tend to go off to lots of different secondaries, so only a couple from their school will go to any one high school.
Going for anything other than the local comprehensive would mean hours travelling and/ or bankrupting ourselves with school fees which I feel is really damaging to family life- my parents did all that so we could go private and I always felt I would have done just as well and been happier at the local school. Am I being naive?
Please reassure me that I'm being ridiculous and to follow my instincts and go with the local comprehensive school.