Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Scotsnet

Welcome to Scotsnet - discuss all aspects of life in Scotland, including relocating, schools and local areas.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Peter Murrell embezzlement trial

1000 replies

Sunnnyday · 25/05/2026 10:28

Peter Murrell is in court in Edinburgh today. This is for the preliminary hearing which was postponed from before the election. It will be interesting to see how the criminal proceedings proceed.

www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/peter-murrell-arrives-at-court-ahead-of-hearing-on-embezzlement-charges/ar-AA23Ybuy?ocid=msedgntp&pc

OP posts:
Thread gallery
67
GTTSR · 23/06/2026 10:55

I think sentence is fair …I don’t even mind if he gets out early for good behaviour or if it is reduced on appeal. I agree with his lawyer that the real sentence has been the public humiliation and loss of dignity he has experienced ( and I am no Peter Murrell fan).

Marmaladeaddict · 23/06/2026 10:56

Cismyfatarse · 23/06/2026 09:56

5 years and 3 months. Out in…..2??

I don't actually think that's a very long sentence considering the amount of money he's embezzled.

JuliaRobHurts · 23/06/2026 11:23

Marmaladeaddict · 23/06/2026 10:56

I don't actually think that's a very long sentence considering the amount of money he's embezzled.

It is when you consider Michelle Mone's swindled £122 million and has so far got off scot free. Hasn't even been stripped of her peerage so in comparison this sentence is impressive.

ChapmanFarm · 23/06/2026 11:32

No mitigation offered.

They just want it probing no further.

Helpmaboa · 23/06/2026 11:42

GTTSR · 23/06/2026 10:55

I think sentence is fair …I don’t even mind if he gets out early for good behaviour or if it is reduced on appeal. I agree with his lawyer that the real sentence has been the public humiliation and loss of dignity he has experienced ( and I am no Peter Murrell fan).

Agreed

Helpmaboa · 23/06/2026 11:42

ChapmanFarm · 23/06/2026 11:32

No mitigation offered.

They just want it probing no further.

This is so weird

Samewrinklesnewname · 23/06/2026 11:46

Helpmaboa · 23/06/2026 11:42

This is so weird

It’ll all come out in his book!

Unrivalled · 23/06/2026 11:55

I can see their point about position of trust but…do I really think PM needs to be in jail for 5 plus years - everyone knows his name as a laughing stock. He’s hardly dangerous.

SirChenjins · 23/06/2026 12:21

That's a fair sentence - and more than I thought he'd get.

Of course, questions still need to be answered - there's no way NS (and others) didn't know about this.

Cismyfatarse · 23/06/2026 12:34

I think the sentence is fair. But, do I think he should be put in under 3 years. Not sure. I feel he is partly being punished by the process and public shame. But, has he been entirely honest? Has he fully shared who knew / what they knew / how he concealed it? I don’t think so. And I feel he should be required to do that - total public honesty, before he gets let out.

Cismyfatarse · 23/06/2026 12:47

*out in under three years.

Motheranddaughter · 23/06/2026 12:48

I thought it was important he was treated the same as anyone else and I think he has been

Long period of criminality/ gross breach of trust/large amount stolen
Against being a first offender/low risk of reoffending and money being paid back

Interesting there was no mitigation or explanation offered,he really has carried the can

Motheranddaughter · 23/06/2026 12:49

JuliaRobHurts · 23/06/2026 11:23

It is when you consider Michelle Mone's swindled £122 million and has so far got off scot free. Hasn't even been stripped of her peerage so in comparison this sentence is impressive.

Has Michelle Mone been convicted in a criminal court

Helpmaboa · 23/06/2026 17:35

Saw this on Twitter 😄

Peter Murrell embezzlement trial
GTTSR · 23/06/2026 18:59

Murrell documentary on BBC2 now…

JSMill · 23/06/2026 19:10

Helpmaboa · 23/06/2026 17:35

Saw this on Twitter 😄

That’s brilliant!

SirChenjins · 23/06/2026 19:10

@Helpmaboa 😂😂

Marmaladeaddict · 23/06/2026 19:31

Unrivalled · 23/06/2026 11:55

I can see their point about position of trust but…do I really think PM needs to be in jail for 5 plus years - everyone knows his name as a laughing stock. He’s hardly dangerous.

He needs to be punished.

TobyEsterhase · 23/06/2026 19:38

Motheranddaughter · 23/06/2026 12:48

I thought it was important he was treated the same as anyone else and I think he has been

Long period of criminality/ gross breach of trust/large amount stolen
Against being a first offender/low risk of reoffending and money being paid back

Interesting there was no mitigation or explanation offered,he really has carried the can

I believe he will have "carried the can" in exchange for a very favourable divorce settlement

awaynboilyurheid · 23/06/2026 20:49

And once again zero mention of how the court appearance was moved till after the election, the SNP have manipulated the courts and not one reporter in Scotland is asking how they did it.

Motheranddaughter · 23/06/2026 20:55

awaynboilyurheid · 23/06/2026 20:49

And once again zero mention of how the court appearance was moved till after the election, the SNP have manipulated the courts and not one reporter in Scotland is asking how they did it.

Absolutely this
Disgraceful

SirChenjins · 23/06/2026 20:55

awaynboilyurheid · 23/06/2026 20:49

And once again zero mention of how the court appearance was moved till after the election, the SNP have manipulated the courts and not one reporter in Scotland is asking how they did it.

Agree. The lines between the Scottish legal system, media and the SNP are far too blurred.

Butchyrestingface · 23/06/2026 22:33

A Sassanach sent me this on WhatsApp.

Peter Murrell embezzlement trial
Marmaladeaddict · 25/06/2026 21:49

Says it all

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.