You've made a lot of incorrect assumptions there.
Rather than explaining my CV in detail to you (which I'd rather not do for various reasons which have nothing to do with this thread), I'm just going to point to the part in his job description which refers to him working out in the communities directly during the evening. It's not a simple PM role, although clearly there are aspects of it.
If you think that he can understand the issues that women face with menstruation and menopause, you think that young girls will relate to a young man and feel comfortable that their voice is well-represented by him, if you believe that a man with no prior knowledge or experience of women's health should be the public face of a campaign about menstruation and menopause, then we don't have any common ground.
The job description makes it very clear he's expected to be visible, to be the face of the campaign, and to engage directly with the communities with outreach activities, in addition to the PM duties. I feel he's wholly inappropriate and not remotely comparable to men in other positions such as gynaecologist (which PP have cited).
I think we're going round in circles here so as I said to a PP, probably pointless continuing this because we're both bashing our heads against a brick wall and getting nowhere.