I'm really worried about the various tiers to be announced. Bizarrely, probably most worried about the "lowest" one, which NS said would be "the closest to normality that we can reasonably expect to live with until we have a vaccine". So that will be the best we can expect for the foreseeable future. And the odds of that including things like theatre, choirs, school assemblies, normal meetings with no distancing etc I think are pretty low
.
Of course I'm worried too about the top level, which could be more like lockdown, but at least there is the pretence that that will just be short term where imposed. But I do hope there are given levels/ rates or whatever, at which it would be introduced and relaxed. Otherwise areas could potentially be in it indefinitely which doesn't bear thinking about. Of course, I've got my fingers crossed Edinburgh isn't slung into it from the outset.
I'm a bit annoyed at her reasoning for the introduction of the top tier...
"When England published their [system] the chief medical officer in England at the time said he thought the top level was not enough to necessarily, in all circumstances, get the virus down. So we think we need one above that... "
Yes, that's true, but the current restrictions in the central belt are already tighter than England's tier 3 (albeit not quite as harsh as a full lockdown, apart from on the livelihood of bars, restaurants and leisure centres etc ) ...and the CMO as far as I know hasn't commented on these restrictions. So why do we need to go one further before the effectiveness of those has been established?