Okay, I think we are brokering some agreement now Rafwife which is good!
I will very often say if I see double-standards on here that are anti-men, but I just want to sound you out about a few issues.
We are both agreed I think, that living in a state of hyper-vigilance and invasions of privacy are corrosive to a marriage.
But are we also agreed that the OP's H appears to have very skewed morality about female sexuality? That he perhaps sees female desire as "unseemly" in a wife and mother and cannot enact a fun-filled sexual experience with his wife? That perhaps he connects fantasy sex with "other women" and doesn't really see a problem with this, since all his male relatives feel the same, as do most of the poor OP's female relatives, it would seem .
Do you see that faith issues might have got in the way here, somewhat? But abandoned when it suited? That somehow the bit in the Koran about honouring women has had the effect of desexualising the married muslim woman, but not women outside of the marriage?
This is not to denigrate people's faiths, but the fact remains that religions of all sorts and misogyny are heavily linked.
Who knows when this first started, perhaps the OP can explain more? What does seem obvious is that this couple are hurting and that both their behaviours are demeaning to the other.
Asking the OP to stop invading privacy is reasonable, but asking her to relax her attitudes about porn, sex texting and sex line use is not. She feels disrespected by it and she's entitled to.
Asking the OP to stop this dance and get talking about her H's views on sexuality within the marriage, so that they both have some fun and fantasy within it, is a good thing. Being honest about fidelity and expectations is also reasonable. Marriages never become affair-proofed by having a happy, sexually fulfilling marriage alone. If only that were true.
They become invulnerable to infidelity by being honest about temptation and if both parties are completely signed up to never bringing hurt to the door, by communicating directly and honestly about threats to the marriage and not keeping secrets from one another.
And finally, can you acknowledge that a dislike of porn does not equate to sexual prudishness? That is is possible to be extremely open about sex and have a "filthy sex life" as AF so humorously put it - and still not like porn? And that not all men are the same and have the same stimuli? Or that an increasing number of men (especially fathers) are also questioning it like never before?
These issues are sensitive and complex I think and I know from my point of view, I reacted quite strongly to your "all men, it's a biological fact..." stance in your initial posts, as well as your assertion that women who dislike porn have "issues and hang-ups about sex". So I responded quite critically to that, as I tend to with any blanket statements that cannot be based on fact, since none of us know "all men", or the varying reasons why men and women dislike porn.