I wonder why people equate emotional closeness with “navel gazing” when they are not the same thing at all!
I’m in my late fifties and received lots of (slightly condescending in some instances) answers like this when I started a thread once questioning my long term relationship with a good but fairly emotionless bloke:
“Oh aren’t you too old for that sort of thing?”
“Surely you don’t want personal discussions at your age?”
“Why do you need to open up to your oh after all of this time?
Well each to their own and if a less intense relationship works for you then fine, but tbh I do still want a bit more than friendship and superficial chats over a cup of tea. Not least because I have actual friends for that! I do still want someone who I can be completely open with and I would hope that he could come to me with any worries, aspirations, impressions he may have too. And I want a good level of physical intimacy too!
You set your own standards op! Trust your gut. Don’t be swayed by what other people think “women of a certain age” should be happy with. It’s what you are happy with that is important!
Prue Leith fell head over heels in love when she was seventy; age has nothing to do with it!
It’s great to pair up with a man who is fully independent and self-sufficient but it’s not hugely attractive to be in a relationship with someone who doesn’t appear to be that bothered either way!
I agree with pp that a lot of older men come with “baggage” and because in their eyes they have been “burned” once they are too cautious, too afraid, too weary to fully commit a second time. Or they didn’t really commit fully the first time for that matter!