@Nicanabanana I totally agree with you. One of a pair allowing intimacy, sex, love to die on the vine can be corrosive, to the point where the fabric of the relationship frays, sometime to the point of breakage beyond repair. And I think chapter 10 (?) in 12 More Rules is particularly good at getting that across in a man-to-man way. As well as laying out some good solutions towards narrowing the rift that evolves during the “not in the bloody mood” years. A solution is needed. But there are many, many paths to be considered and attempted before a child’s future outcomes in life need to be gambled with.
@Thisisworsethananticpated On one aspect the evidence (thus far) there does seem to be clarity.
The poorer outcomes of a divorce are still better than the even poorer outcomes a child in an abusive home suffers. It’s not that divorce doesn’t affect them. They have no special immunity. But the damage so far done + the damage incurred from a parental split is still far less damaging for the children than staying in an abusive dynamic.
Not all the kids are fucked. I promise, it’s not as bleak as that.
The use of abuse by laypeople does not always coincide with how professionals evaluate and measure it. In both directions.
Some parents will deny entirely evident abuse, and continue in their coupledom even if you point to all the very obvious ways their children have been, are being and will be harmed. They will cling to the “better outcomes” of children from intact families as justification for their choice to stay together, deny the abusive nature of their pairing and tell a world (who is giving them this face 🤨) they are an extra good parent doing their best for their child.
There are also parents who will take any slight, irritation, disappointed or let down and magnify it. Until they feel justified in relabelling it abuse, in order to grab the “lesser harms” of children in abusive homes + divorce. So they get to leave for their own reasons AND polish their “good parent” halos.
Those kids likely range from deffo fucked, to somewhat fucked at best.
The difference in outcomes between “just about good enough” parents and “fucking AMAZING” parents is surprisingly small. Every kid with just about good enough parents, who manage to find a way through rough patches, work on imperfect matches of values/needs/desires (which isn’t static over the years) and hang on in there, are not fucked.
Each of those children will have their own, individual nature+nurture cross to bear. Divorce is not the sole cause of mental illness or wellbeing issues. So kids in intact, “good enough” homes are not immune from either. But they will have one less specific “bucket of pain” to lug through life when compared to their counterpart with a parent who chose to twist rather than stick.
How big the bucket of pain a specific child of divorce gets, is anyone’s guess. It doesn’t seem to correlate as tidily with polite, non conflictual co-parenting as was once presumed. That’s not to say post split conflict is no biggie for the kids’ outcomes. It is. But the absence of conflict and existence of cordiality between separated parents is not a step by step recipe for a child of divorce minus the poorer outcomes. I have my hunches, as per why. But at present, there doesn’t seem to be much study in that direction. Not that I’ve found anyway.
I think we threw out quite a few babies with the bath water with divorce from the late 70s onwards. Of course not all marriages are going to make it. Humans get married. They are fallible, fuck up, fuck people over (even by accident) and fuck about. Divorce needs to exist. But at some point the warnings professionals were giving about the negative impacts of staying in a volatile home got translated (probably the media’s fault, human interest does tend to get good ratings) into “unhappy parent/s=unhappy child so following what makes parent happy = better for the kids”. As a result a lot of children got accidentally thrown under the bus by parents who would willingly die rather than harm them. But they didn’t know what they didn’t know.