@Cheeseandwin5
So... I'm a misogynist to say that he needs to allow his girlfriend the space to decide what happens to her own body, right now? To say that he is coming across as controlling (not that he actually is, because... I don't know him!) because he isn't taking into consideration the fact that he and his girlfriend had sex 4 weeks ago, split up, she slept with someone else (and, as I said, so might he have - and he's just not mentioned it in his posts), and now she's pregnant. It probably isn't his baby, but he's alluded to telling the woman that he won't stay with her (and presumably she loves him, else why get back with him and be honest about having slept with another man ) during pregnancy (a time when women are, generally, pretty darned vulnerable without the "will it be this or that man's baby?!" hanging over their heads), and hinted in his posts that he'll distance himself for his own sake, then - if the baby turns out to be his - expect to pick up where he left off.
Or was it for pointing out that 2-3 weeks is actually too early to state that a pregnancy will "stick"? For saying that it's his girlfriend's uterus and only she has the right to decide what happens with its contents? For pointing out that any man - or woman, for that matter - heaping the "I'll only stay with you if..." comments onto a newly pregnant woman is abusive.
I haven't agreed with any of the posters who have pointed out how naive the OP and his girlfriend actually come across as, nor commented on what idiots she and the other man were for using the rhythm method of contraception in the first darned place. Which they were. I have, however, stated that the OP and his girlfriend both need to have STI tests done - as have other posters. That's... oh, wait, what's it called again? Oh, that's right. Common fucking sense.
I've simply stated my opinion. Which you claim I'm crazy for having and, not only that, being able to articulate.
Yet I'm the crazy one. The anti-men one. Yeah. Okay, then. Except... contrary to your posit that this is ALL about the OP - it isn't. Right now, it's ALL about the girlfriend and her potential pregnancy. About whether or not he actually loves her enough to stay and support HER through whatever happens - miscarriage, termination, or eventual baby. It's HER child, regardless of whether it's the OP's or the other man's - and, frankly, he needs to wrap his head around the possibility that, if she is pregnant and he fails to be there for her, if SHE chooses to proceed with it, she may not be willing to pick up where they left off as he seems to be assuming.
Would I be saying the same thing if he'd gotten a ONS pregnant? Actually, yes; I would. I have done on other posts, actually - and to RL friends. We only have the OP's word for it, after all, that this is his girlfriend and not a ONS who has suddenly rocked up with a 2-3 week pregnancy test result, don't we? That's all we can go off - the OP's word.
Why don't you focus on what he has said and what he has alluded to in his posts if you feel like attacking someone? Because attacking me, or any of the other posters who have responded stating that they all sound very irresponsible, and naive, and unsupportive/loving, and so forth, is very negative. It also makes me wonder why you attacked me and not any of the others who have said far worse in their responses...
Now, to borrow a phrase, why don't you just jog on, eh?!