@NewName12
Except if the woman is the one with the house/good job etc. Then marriage gives him rights the same as it would vice versa.
I own my house in my sole name, and had significant savings/pensions etc. Marriage has weakened my financial status as in it has given dh the right to 50% of my property.
In the vast majority of cases, women do not have much more wealth and assets than men they are in relationships with, and secondly, even if they do, so what if the man is allowed to claim half of everything if you are married and you split after 20 years and 3 kids?
Or are you suggesting that WOMEN should be entitled to half of everything, (in the event of a split,) but it's not OK on the rare occasion that the situation is reversed?
@Haffiana
This needs to be taught in schools. So many truly unknowing women on here who buy into the 'it's only a piece of paper' and 'we don't need marriage to prove our love for each other' nonsense. I see it on thread after thread in Relationships and AIBU.
Marriage was never about love. It was always about the legalities concerning children, property and assets.
Amen to that!
The 'it's only a piece of paper' brigade make me want to tear my hair out with frustration and rage. No it's NOT only a piece of fucking paper, you muppet!
The OP is not on the house deeds or council tax or any damn thing. Her partner is mugging her off big style!