Will try not to write an essay;
My husband often seems to get angry/bad tempered/ frustrated during a crisis.
Today a minor crisis cropped bul when he was trying to change our extremely active 10 month old's nappy and she got a hold of some liquid soap and squirted it into her mouth and eye.
We were advised by go out of hrs to take hef to a&e as a precaution and did so but before we left I noticed him getting angry and frustrated (and verbalising it) trying to wash her eye area, bumping against something in our cluttered (moved house and with young baby things are disorganised etc etc. His communi cation with me wax also snappy/bad tempered.
I was in no mood to put up with it, had noticed it on previous occasions and decided that if he was going to be bad tempered with me (esp hang done nothing to merit it) he could see what if was like to have it back.
After the a&e visit, I raised the issue and this resulted in an extended row.
In one of the more articulate (!) Moments of the row, I said that it was not my job to pacify him during a crisis when I was already trying to deal/help with the crisis and his response was that 'then we can not be in a relationship'.
He expanded by saying that people have different reactions to crises and that that is his (not all of the time but some), that anger can be very useful in some crisis/situations and that should 'balance' things. Also that because I was saying I would not, we are not suited to a relationship, I'm too volatile, it's a bad combination etc
(I could but I don't feel I should have to).
He seems to think this is perfectly reasonable. He explained that he doesn't mean I should be viewed by his anger/temper these times (in a response to my incredulous question) but kept saying there needs to be balance. So presumably someone who doesn't respond to his anger of reciprocate it.
He thinks this is reasonable, I'd like to show him some people's pinions (though I have a feeling he'll say a group of women will naturally side with me) I'll still try.