This.
And this couple are not even married, they don't live together. She wanted this guy to leave his kids, his sister to get ready and go to his home and spend the night. And she even organised it with his sister without his say so.
Can you imagine if a man organised childcare for a single mother without her involvement?. Decided it was more important she be with him and his minorly cut finger and she should leave her kids. Irrelevant if she had work in the morning, if the sister did, the kids had school, she should just up and leave the kids as he "needed her" to support him with his cut finger. He'd be lynched on here.
But becayse she's a woman and she "needed him" for her cut finger, he should abandon everything else in her favour.
Shocks me anyone can agree with that and not feel deep and utter shame.
Agree with Bluntness completely here, she's nailed it.
I'm not usually a fan of the 'if this was other gender' approach to AIBU, but in this case it's perfectly used. And hopefully will show PP who think OP wasn't unreasonable why she really, really was! I can't see any PP claiming the situation bluntness has reversed it to is in any way acceptable?
Tbh I'm struggling to believe it happened exactly how OP described and maybe she's mixed something up as I just can't believe that anyone would take it upon themselves to ring their live out partner's family to try and get childcare for them to go sit with her in hospital for a cut finger. I just didn't know people like that existed in the world!
If I was such a drama queen and insisted on going to A&E (and wasting resources so badly) for something and my OH (live together) could come along, I know he would, as he would want to support me if he'd tried to persuade me otherwise and I insisted on going anyway. But if he was busy with something important (like work, or childcare, or with friends) I would never ask him to and I suspect he'd agree with me the appropriate level of support would be a few texts if he was able to to see how it's going.