That would seem to imply it's sexist of me to make sure I don't get drunk when out and about, to ensure I stay with a group and don't walk home alone, to guard my drink so it doesn't get spiked, to not invite someone I've just met to my house. The Police advise all this.
No it does not imply that and no I do not think that.
I'm not going to dispute your figures, as I know about them, but they are not the whole picture. What is left out are the figures for all the male-on-male violence. Be you man or woman, the most likely source of danger to you is another man.
Yes I did not mention male on male violence and of course you are right. As a male between 25-40 I am much more likely to experience male violence than you, and I have. The vast majority of violence is male and is against other males.
But hey, lets get hung up on the vastly smaller and less impactful amount of violence meted out by females, because no one has ever tried to derail a thread about the male propensity to violence like that before. Oh wait...
I don't see how mentioning female on male violence in the context of a discussion about the role of socialisation in leading to violent tendencies is 'derailing the thread' but I understand that you don't want to discuss it. I don't think your dismissal of 800,000 victims of female violence as 'less impactful' does you much credit to be honest. Surely we can acknowledge that there is a real problem with male violence whilst ALSO recognising that violence is not purely a gender issue?
If I thought you were seriously listening and engaging with me I would continue talking, but it's become clear to me you are only interested in proving me wrong.
No, I'm not just interested in proving you wrong and I'm sad that you feel that way. You've obviously had a shit time and I'm genuinely sorry for that. If you want to be 'wary' of men then go for it if that makes you happy and safe. I'll bow out now and wish you the best. 