I see no reason why having sex quickly means it's less likely to lead to a relationship, unless the man is a misogynist who thinks women should be chaste and loses respect for those who aren't. In that case I'd rather find out sooner rather than later, than wait months for sex whilst chewing my own arm off with sexual frustration only to fall in love with an undesirable!
The guy looking for a long term relationship, shag him or not, he is still "man looking for a relationship".
Totally agree with this DrMorbius. Ignoring what they say (because many will BS their way into a lady's knickers), it's what they really want that is the deciding factor.
"Wanting to see if we are sexually compatible: If sex is more than just about receiving physical pleasure, and is/or should/ is better to be about having a real mental/emotional and physical connection with someone"
TheMarxistMinx, I place no great emotional importance on sex. To me it really is just a fun activity that creates physical pleasure, and the only reason it gets better as I get to know someone is that they learn how to turn me on better with time and practice. The emotional part of relationships for me happen outside the bedroom. I do not link sex to love.
However, in my youth I did link emotions to sex and would've been really upset if I'd been "pumped and dumped". But that was because I felt sex was a "gift" I gave to men and placed importance on that being respected. Now my mindset has changed I feel in a much stronger place regarding dating and men.
"Tbh I wouldnt even go on a date with a guy I didnt want to shag."
Same here, Branleuse. I don't waste time dating men whom I might start to fancy in time. Nope, it has to be lust at first sight.