Very quickly, the thing is, there aren't really any other angles that count.
What costa said is right.
Put it like this.
When you met him, there was nothing between you. No debt amd no profit. You were at zero.
The 'good' stuff he's doing now is what he'd have to do to maintain homeostasis. If the crap hadn't happened, he'd still be at zero. It's not bad, but it's not really good. It's just the bare minimum one should expect. To maintain homeostasis.
All the crap he did before pushed him into relationship debt. He dumped you: minus 2. He dumped you 3 times in a couple of weeks: minus 6. With the bonus because you were pregnant, that's minus 16 altogether.
Then each time he got cross etc at your kids, he got further into relationship/emotional debt.
You had to go to the csa. He lost another 10 points.
Each time he did something bad, he got further into emotional debt. What's he at now? Shall we say minus 50? Minus 60? More?
Which brings us back to now. At the moment, you're rigjt, he's not making the situation worse. But he's only maintaining relationship/emotional homeostasis.
Which means he's still at minus 50/60/70 whatever.
Even if we were generous and said these could be counted as positives, he's what? At minus 45/minus 55? Because really, he hasn't made things better really, he's just stopped making them worse.
That is why I think it's a bad idea. That's why people are suggesting you give it 6 months, without the children (when they're in bed).
That's why you're not really feeling it.
It's going to take him ages to get back to zero, let alone start banking any of the good stuff for a rainy day.
Does that make sense?
And that's why the good stuff is getting ignored. If you were £30,000 in debt, would you expect raise for paying off a fiver?