I'm going to post one more thing, because I'd really like the OP to take a look at the FWR threads, but I suspect that, at the moment, her view of 'feminist' ideas would be rather negative. It's ok, OP, you're supposed to think feminism is about a bunch of irrational, men hating harpies screeching a bit too loudly, because it's necessary for you to think like that in order to maintain the status quo. It's not your fault.
So, Typing, to answer your earlier question, the problem with the 'mainstream' view is a) it's generally controlled by those in a privileged position, and it generally serves to protect them and their position, b) it relies on people being too scared/stupid/ready to conform to challenge it.
So, to take it away from the current subject...
On a really basic level, it's why the popular music charts are full of crap music; why people wear ugly fashion; and why football is as popular as it is. It's not because One Direction (or whoever, couldn't actually name anyone else who is currently considered 'popular'!) represent the best in music; it's not because ponchos are cool; and it's not because watching football and then sitting in the pub talking about football is the very best way to spend every weekend...
It's because the people who decide what 'mainstream' music/fashion/sports/anything will be are the ones who have more power (money) than those on the periphery. And it relies on the general population not having the imagination or intelligence to even realise that there are valid alternatives out there, or the confidence to explore it if they do.
Very simply, the authority voice silences the 'other' voice and those who position themselves with the 'other' are mocked, derided, ridiculed, excluded, minimised and feared precisely because the 'authority' doesn't want to be challenged. Why would it? It benefits from things staying the same. But all the great advances in societies (e.g. ending slavery/votes for women/gay rights) are made by those who reject the mainstream; the non-conformists. Because mainstream does not mean right.
But if we bring this back to the current discussion, the reason the mainstream is damaging is because 'our' mainstream view on particular issue is dictated by the 'authority' voice in our society, which is that of men. Women support it because they don't want to be 'uncool' or because they don't want to be seen as one of them blasted feminists (because many men don't like them and a lot of people like to align themselves with the majority/authority voice). Or because they've accepted it as natural law (when it's not) or because they lack the skills of critical analysis that would enable them to deconstruct it and see it for what it really is.
The reason 'we' view women as "dressing provocatively", "teasing" and other negative, misogynistic language, is because it has, until very, very recently, been used as a defence for men who choose to do appalling things to women as a means of excusing them. And in many cases, still is. And it's because the law was written by men and then applied by men, to defend men... Do you see?
I really do hope you read around this.