Well, tbh., assumed you were a troll, especially at 4 am.
Anyway, re: the groundbreaking discovery [blah] that female sexuality is "not the rational, civilized and balancing force it’s so often made out to be — that it is base, animalistic and ravenous" ... er, the belief that female sexuality is dark and dangerous and nigh uncontrollable is very old. Like, Adam and Eve old. That belief has been used to curtail women's autonomy for a very long time.
Who the hell has painted female sexuality as rational and civilized, ever??
And why does female sexuality need to be one or the other? Next are we going to be getting a treatise on madonna sexuality (calming and wholesome experience, almost like meditating) vs. whore sexuality (feels like being eaten alive by a cheetah)? That'll be an interesting twist.