I think the problem is that, when the 2 of you got married, you entered into an agreement/contract whereby each of you agreed to carry out certain tasks - this is putting it rather formally, but essentially this is what marriage is about. For example, you both agreed to love each other, be there through thick and thin, etc. When you got married, you seem to have carried out the physical side of the agreement with no problems and presumably, when you agreed to get married, there was no suggestion from you that this particular part of the agreement was only temporary. What I am trying to say is that you have changed the terms of your marriage unilaterally and your dh has had no say in this change.
In business, if one party unilaterally changes the terms of a contract, the other party is entitled to rescind the entire contract. Whilst marriage is not viewed in the same way as a business contract, the basic tenets apply.
I think the negative responses you've had on here are more to do with the fact that you think it's OK to change how you perform in this marriage regardless of how your dh feels about it, but that, if he were to change the way he performs (e.g. by seeking physical affection elsewhere), you would be outraged and offended. I think this is known as hypocrisy.
Physical affection, be it sex or just hugs and cuddles, is an important part of marriage and to remove that from the equation changes the whole nature of your relationship. I think your dh deserves more.