I agree that the kitchen is odd - the mix of cabinet styles coupled with the two different colours and the visible appliances particularly. Then there's no sign of your oven/hob! (And I'm saying that as someone who had two different colour cabinets in the kitchen at our previous house - but a) they were the same style and b) the wall cupboards were the lighter colour - darker on top always looks wrong, imo).
Add in your exposed boiler/strangely painted pipework and it certainly doesn't resemble a recently redone kitchen. Unfortunately to many people that equates to loads of work/expense. As a cheap fix @Blueysothermother I'd probably repaint the wall cupboards to match the base cabinets and add a fabric 'skirt' over the kitchen appliances. I'd also add a photo of the oven/hob.
The downstairs loo photo isn't doing you any favours (apart from the lack of basin, that boxing needs fixing!), so I'd lose that one.
The bathroom is period style, appropriate to the age of the house and lovely - I don't get the hate on here for that room. These posters have obviously never seen a Drummonds/Thomas Crapper bathroom!
I love deep, saturated period colours, but yours are a bit 'marmite' - but it's refreshing to see a house that isn't drowning in grey, white or greige! I agree that there is too much busy artwork and the front room furniture makes the space look cramped - I'd lose the leather sofa which is sucking the light out of the room.
We always buy projects so none of this would deter me from viewing as it's a really lovely, unspoilt house with a cute, characterful garden. However, the price needs to reflect the proximity of the stadium and the fact the house only has three true bedrooms.