Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Primary education

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

Y6 Sats results - are they out yet?

240 replies

Hottoday · 04/07/2015 08:19

Wondering if schools will have received them yet?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Myspace76 · 10/07/2015 23:35

That comment was @waitingandhoping 2015

var123 · 11/07/2015 00:24

Myspace76 - WAITINGANDHOPING was both wrong and atypical. Please do not allow her to make you prejudiced against neither City workers, white people nor middle/upper class people. Her comments (even if genuine) do not describe how recruitment is done in the City.

Myspace76 · 11/07/2015 09:10

Hi, var I'm not prejudiced against city workers, it's just sad to hear what happens behind the scenes and I don't think it's just the in city where this takes place..Also some of my best friends are white, middle class and work in the city.

By the way DD1 (of mixed heritage - i.e. half white middle class, with a foreign sounding name, who has an uncle with a foreign sounding name who works in the city ) got all levels 6s in all areas of the SATS tests xx

MN164 · 11/07/2015 09:23

Level 6 hattrick. Younger sibling also working 2 years ahead of expected.

This is the only place I will "brag". Not at school.

However, Facebook was full of results from proud parents.

I'm totally guilty of feeling proud and trying to live a vicarious victory.

To help me feed my guilty pleasure, does anyone know what percentage of year 6 gets level 6?

spanieleyes · 11/07/2015 10:12

Last year 0% for reading ( we think it was 0.14% but rounded to 0%!!), 4% for GAPS and 9% for Maths. This was for approx 560,000 Year 6's in the country so approx 800 in the country for reading, 22,400 for GAPS and 50,400 for maths

MN164 · 11/07/2015 12:53

Thanks. Best buy them both an ice cream treat.

rabbitstew · 11/07/2015 14:02

However recruitment is done in the City, it failed abjectly at screening out the people who gambled recklessly, cynically and ultimately dangerously with the world economy. So maybe some lessons could/should be learned! I wouldn't look to the City for good recruitment practice, whether it is done along the lines of WaitingandHoping's claims or otherwise. Too many rotten apples let in.

missme10 · 11/07/2015 17:49

Sorry to be pendantic, but the L6 maths papers have been out of 24 and 26 for the last two years. Not entirely sure why.

missme10 · 11/07/2015 18:07

It's probably worth adding that sub-levels in SATs results are basically made up by the school/teacher. There are no 3a's, 5c's etc. Only straight levels are given. So perhaps take the sub-level with a pinch of salt.

We didn't get a L6 in reading (highest mark was 14). I believe there are none of these "higher" papers next year.

wheresthebeach · 11/07/2015 19:16

But its normal to report sub levels isn't it? To show where they are in the level - just getting it v nearly got it all.

I'm asking because DD's report has no sub levels at all. Just a level, and I was expecting sub levels from the teacher assessment but not the SATS paper.

mrz · 11/07/2015 19:17

No it isn't usual to report sub levels

var123 · 11/07/2015 20:43

rabbitstew - don't forget that the investment banks are global businesses. They have offices around the world and the people who work in London are from everywhere. You would find lots of americans, greks, french, germans, eastern europeans, australians, etc.etc.
In London, I worked in an office with: Greeks, French, Irish, Americans - both new englanders and californias- , NZ, Australians, South Africans, a man from Uganada, Finns, Germans, dutch, Israelis and a Gaza Strip arab.

Actually, that alone gives the lie to the other posters "strange surname" filter.

The media and politicians have been enjoying the whole greedy bankers story for years. I think they keep going because of jealousy and because its so popularist. However, on the ground that's not the main cause of the problem. The cause boiled down to things becoming so sophisticated that no one really understood them or fully knew how they were correlated because it was beyond the human brain. It was just another investment bubble, just like the one that's bursting in China atm.

rabbitstew · 11/07/2015 22:08

If you don't understand what you are doing, you shouldn't be doing it and pocketing big bonuses to do it. Ignorance is a pathetic excuse for supposedly intelligent people - I've never known anyone else get away with saying their job, from which they failed to resign, was too complicated for them to understand.

MN164 · 11/07/2015 22:13

The city uses an extreme "all carrot, no stick" model of short term incentives focussed exclusively on short term profits. Humans are... Well... Human and very inventive and often lacking in moral or ethical limits when faced with such focussed prizes.

For me that explains everything that is wrong with it.

wheresthebeach · 11/07/2015 22:30

Thanks Vevvie - I guess I need to ask the school for the raw scores.

DottyTrotty · 13/07/2015 13:55

I have 4 children - 3 of which have been through KS2 SATs. DD1 got all 4s; DD2 got 5s in English and 4 in Maths; DS1 just got his and got 5s in English Reading and SPAG and 6 in Maths. I am extremely proud of all of them as they all try hard at school to achieve their potential. My DS1 has just done her GCSEs and is predicted mostly Bs with a couple of As and a possible A* in Drama. She is funny, kind, lovely, caring and well rounded as are all my kids and I have a good feeling that they will all do well in life and thankfully none want to work in a City Bank!

DottyTrotty · 13/07/2015 13:58

My DC who has done her GCSEs is as DD not a DS!!

Wittynewnameifonly · 14/07/2015 21:43

Seeing this is the thread where we are allowed to boast (aren't we??), I have just found out that DS got 45/50 on the level 6 maths paper which I am so proud of!

I knew he should have been a solid pass but am amazingly happy for him with that result as he loves maths.

In other news I don't know the score but do know he was a way off getting the 6 in SPAG which wasn't a big surprise. So I don't have a genius overall just a maths whizz Smile

YeOldTrout · 15/07/2015 10:27

DS was told sublevels verbally but on paper we only have whole numbers. Quite funny to read people saying the sublevels are made up, when next you read MN angst about "my child hasn't made the prerequisite 2 sublevels progress in last year" thread.

My big surprise was yr2 child (DC4) who got the best yr2 results ever for any of my DC. Doesn't make up for the fact that he has daily behaviour problems at school, though :(.

CarlaJones · 15/07/2015 12:56

When I asked dd's teacher I think she said she got 92 on the level 5 maths paper (level 3-5 paper?) which is a 5b. I thought she said it was 5 marks below a 5a, but when I googled grade boundaries, it seemed to be 2 below. Anyone know?

Chewbecca · 15/07/2015 13:16

I've saved this link from MN to interpret my DS's results (when we are finally given them!). I think it was MRZ who posted this which usually means reliable!

This says 87-93 = 5B and 94-100 = 5A so supports your theory rather than the teachers.

(Sorry if I am just repeating where you already got your info from!)

CarlaJones · 15/07/2015 13:29

Thanks. It would have been good to be able to note down the grades she was giving, but dd was standing there and I didn't want to make too big a deal of it in front of her. I know she said she was 1 mark below 5a in reading. I wonder what the thresholds are for the different sets at secondary school and whether they go by the number or the sublevel. I know the secondary school said they use the sat fine grades in conjunction with other tests they do. In any case I'm sure whichever set she goes into will be the most suitable one for her.

Waitingandhoping2015 · 15/07/2015 14:16

Not 'claims'; completely 'genuine'.

You have no idea what goes on. Wait for the book to come out.

HR people have no idea.

'absolutely top investment bank'... what an awful, embarrassing expression. JPM, MS etc. etc., all as bad as each other.

wheresthebeach · 15/07/2015 14:48

Our school has said they are 'not able' to provide the marks.

Anyone with advice on how to challenge this?

Thanks

Swipe left for the next trending thread