Evening all. Apologies in advance for the "me" based post, having a little wobble...
But before I do I want to say GOOD LUCK to GB! I hope your bp is still behaving itself, I'm assuming it must have been ok for the hospital to let you home? Hopefully LO will arrive without any more dramas to scare mummy!
Crunchie (loving the new name ) I hope DS2 continues to improve, and that DH continues to behave! Fingers firmly crossed for you lovely.
Right. Me. ()
Some of you may remember me posting a while ago about the fact that I was thinking about hiring a doppler for a month (the shortest time you can hire one for) to take on holiday for 10 days. I wasn't sure what to do so I thought it might be a good idea to have a chat with my doula about it. Good plan, right? Wrong. She has basically put the fear of god into me, while all the time telling me it's entirely my decision and that she will support me whatever I decide. But botom line is she told me about a website I'll post a link to in a moment which has various articles on it, including one specifically talking about the risks of ultrasound, whether via a scan or via a doppler.
So far this time round I have had scans at 7, 9, 11, and 15 weeks. I am due another one at 20 weeks. In addidion I have heard the heartbeat at the doctor's 4 times between 13 weeks and 17+5 last week. So there we are, more than some, less than others I suspect. I have managed to stay relatiely sane during this pregnancy so far, and that has largely been due to the reassurance I have had from scans and from hearing the heartbeat, but now I'm worried that the very thing that has been reassuring me, and that reassures most of us here, is putting my baby at risk . She talked about an increased risk of autism, growth retardation and the article talks about an increased risk of still birth. Marvellous. I will talk to my consultant about it when I see him on monday, and I said that to my doula, but she said 'well of course you know he's going to say it's safe - the medical profession treat it as safe because it hasn't been proven not to be'.
I'm sorry for posting something on here that could potentially cause worry to others, but frankly I wasn't sure what else to do. The idea of going through the rest of this pregnancy (currently 18+3) with no more scans and no more listening in is terrifying to contemplate, but not as terrifying as the thought that I might be harming my baby by doing the very thing that reassures me
I know there are inherent risks to our every day life, and that just because we are pregnant we can't wrap ourselves in cotton wool completely, but we're all trying not to do things which might cause our babies harm... Aaarrgghhhh. I feel guilty about posting this, I hope you all understand.
This is the website she told me about, I don't think I can post a link to the articles, but if you want to read them (you have been warned!) then click on Articles (under Contents) then scroll down to AIMS Journal, Volume 16 No 4, 2005 and the articles are "Who says ultrasound is safe?" and "Ultrasound: good news (and bad)". The fact that these were written in 2005 and it's not 2009 has not escaped me by the way.
Thanks in advance for your wise words ladies. xx