Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

Is 37-40 too old for a first baby? 🙁

117 replies

Vanillalatte01 · 19/06/2026 09:42

So I'm currently 35 and my partner (male) is 45. By the time I complete my degree I'll be 37, which is when I plan on trying to conceive naturally. At this point conception may be when I'm between 37-40 and my partner will be 47-50.

• In your opinion, is this too old to have a first baby?
• Did any of you have your first baby at roughly the same age or older?
• How was your pregnancy & delivery?
• Was your baby healthy?

Thanks in advance 🫶🏼

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
whysohardtogetusername · Yesterday 22:38

We started TTC at 33 and I'm only now in my third trimester having turned 38 after IVF at 36/7 after TTC 2 years and 1.5 years fertility testing and IVF. If you want to leave it, get a sperm analysis for your OH and get your own AMH tested now to give you a realistic idea of how long you have and if there are likely to be any issues. Your AMH should give you an idea of what your ovarian reserve is and that's key.

Piglet89 · Yesterday 23:05

whysohardtogetusername · Yesterday 22:38

We started TTC at 33 and I'm only now in my third trimester having turned 38 after IVF at 36/7 after TTC 2 years and 1.5 years fertility testing and IVF. If you want to leave it, get a sperm analysis for your OH and get your own AMH tested now to give you a realistic idea of how long you have and if there are likely to be any issues. Your AMH should give you an idea of what your ovarian reserve is and that's key.

I can’t agree more with this. My AMH was ridiculously low once we eventually had the tests done.

It’s a bit of a miracle we had our son via spontaneous conception, after one of London’s leading fertility experts told us there was no point in our having IVF.

StolenTeapots · Yesterday 23:10

If you want a baby don't wait. My uvf baby is sleeping beside me. I'm 41.

likimagee · Yesterday 23:14

I think your partner is too old.

Devilsmommy · Yesterday 23:17

fiesta · 19/06/2026 09:52

Honestly in this day and age i dont think so. There are no guarantees in life so i say go for it. I know someone who had both of her babies at 40 and 42 and they were perfectly healthy and she had textbook pregnancies. Another at 39. Again perfectly healthy. But you will always find people who have the opposite experience. So in summary people are different. So it can go either way but more and more women are having healthy kids later on in life. However in all honesty there are studies that say the older you are the higher the risk of certain conditions. But this could happen at any age. So my view is no its not too old unless you or your partner already have a genetice disposition to certain conditions.

I was 36 when I had mine and my DH was 53. Though I had high BP in pregnancy I had a good birth and a healthy baby. He's nearly 4 now and is awaiting assessment for autism and is non verbal. I can't help but wonder if that would have been different had I been younger

Devilsmommy · Today 00:21

DontBuyAnotherBook · 25/06/2026 12:10

The age of your partner is more of an issue IMO. It takes long to concieve with a partner that age.

That's bullshit. My DH was 53 and we conceived first try

Bigcat25 · Today 00:43

Devilsmommy · Yesterday 23:17

I was 36 when I had mine and my DH was 53. Though I had high BP in pregnancy I had a good birth and a healthy baby. He's nearly 4 now and is awaiting assessment for autism and is non verbal. I can't help but wonder if that would have been different had I been younger

It's not your age so much as your partner's that would be the factor here. I say that without judgement, my child is autistic as well. Or it could be just random genetics not related to parental age.

ETA just did a quick read and wanted to elaborate that correlation isn't causation. ND might reach life milestones later so may tend to be parents at a later age.

Bigcat25 · Today 01:27

Sorry for the typos above.

pincklop · Today 01:56

What’s the point of doing a degree to then have babies? If you want to start a family now then do it, but why do a degree if it isn’t going to benefit your career or get a family

DontBuyAnotherBook · Today 06:06

Devilsmommy · Today 00:21

That's bullshit. My DH was 53 and we conceived first try

Well you are lucky then. It is a well known medical fact plus it increases the chances of miscarriage. My husband is fifteen years older than me. We needed IVF. I think I have some knowledge on this.

DontBuyAnotherBook · Today 06:07

Devilsmommy · Yesterday 23:17

I was 36 when I had mine and my DH was 53. Though I had high BP in pregnancy I had a good birth and a healthy baby. He's nearly 4 now and is awaiting assessment for autism and is non verbal. I can't help but wonder if that would have been different had I been younger

Interestingly my son is four and nearly non verbal and waiting for an autism assessment. My is in his 50s but was 45 when we did IVF. There is an higher risk of autism with older dads although my husband is probably autistic to be fair.

Devilsmommy · Today 06:28

DontBuyAnotherBook · Today 06:07

Interestingly my son is four and nearly non verbal and waiting for an autism assessment. My is in his 50s but was 45 when we did IVF. There is an higher risk of autism with older dads although my husband is probably autistic to be fair.

Edited

Weird that because my DH definitely displays some traits. There's no diagnosed autism in my family only ADD. So if it came from one or both of us I'll never know

Btowngirl · Today 06:31

We had our first when my life wife was 37 (36 when she got pregnant). Don’t see an issue, DD1 is 4 now and we just love being parents. The young parents will say too old, but I’m glad we had a life first and we can focus & enjoy being parents. We have a second now, my wife was 40 when DD2 was born (I carried second time). We are both fit and healthy though!

As a side note, I was 33 when DD2 was born and the youngest by years in our baby sensory class!

Firetreev · Today 08:24

Beachdrift · 19/06/2026 09:47

What planet are you living on? That's a perfectly normal time to have a first baby. I wasn't even thinking about it till well after that age.

What planet are YOU living on? No it's not too old but the chance of fertility issues increases dramatically after 35. I know countless women in their 40s and 50s who would have loved to have had children and have none because they left it too late. Many of them went through heartbreaking IVF and years and years of trying.

tfu · Today 08:26

I had my first at 38 - not old at all. However I was not able to have a second baby which was a bit sad although I’ve come to terms with it now. Many friends having babies in early 40s keep yourself fit and it’s fine

TheBlueKoala · Today 08:27

@Vanillalatte01 The age is not a problem if you don't have any problems with fertility and will need rounds of ivf. The problem is there is no way to know before you try.

user5683926547 · Today 09:48

Anecdotal of course, but several of the autistic children I know have older fathers. I would just put some thought into considering if that is something you and your DH could cope with. My friend’s DH couldn’t so she now manages two very challenging young boys solo, her life is very hard.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page