Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Pregnancy

Talk about every stage of pregnancy, from early symptoms to preparing for birth.

+ve preg test, meant to be 6weeks preg but bleeding on off and just told blood test level is 417 is this good or bad???

56 replies

soamipregnant · 11/01/2008 17:28

the nurse wouldnt tell me anything

had internal scan today but they said they can only see thickening but I am preg following a test they did but they cant see anything atall

but they say i could be very early preg so this would explain it (if I ovulated late inmy cycle so im not really 6 weeks)

they are monitoring me

but my levels are 417 today this is the first levels I have been told

what i want to know desp is is this a good level for 6 weeks?

does anyone know anything I would be sooooooooooo grateful thank you xx

i have to get more bloods taken on sun am

thanks

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Misdee · 11/01/2008 17:37

i have no idea if its 'good' or not, but it needs to double by sunday i think

lulumama · 11/01/2008 17:39

someone posted this on your other thread

HcG levels

if it does not double by sunday, i would have thought it would indicate a problem, but i am not an expert.

lulumama · 11/01/2008 17:40

could just be you are not as far along as you thikn

Kezza7779 · 11/01/2008 17:44

Hiya i had a quick look on google and it seems that hcg levels (if thats what they are that u mean) go like this....

from conception from LMP (mIU/ML or IU/L)
7 days 3 weeks 0 to 5
14 days 28 days 3 to 426
21 days 35 days 18 to 7,340
28 days 42 days 1080to56,500
35 - 42 days 49 - 56 days 7,650to229,000
43 - 64 days 57 - 78 days25,700to288,000

according to this u would only be 4 weeks? could you be a month out?
although upto 35 days can be between 18 and 7 thousand!!!!

OracleInaCoracle · 11/01/2008 17:47

i have been trying to figure out how to say this, but unless you ov'd about 10 days late it's not looking too good. at 6w they would expect your hormone levels to be about 1,100. however thickening in the womb lining is good. i hate to ask this but did they check your fallopian tubes? fingers crossed for sunday xx

pindy · 11/01/2008 17:51

Good luck - have been watching your threads - take care and I hope all is ok for you.

You may not be as far pregnant as you think - funny things these spermies!!!!!

PortAndLemonaid · 11/01/2008 17:56

You are either

(a) pregnant but more like 4 or 5 weeks pregnant or

(b) it's not looking good -- that's not a good hCG number for 6 weeks.

Best of luck for Sunday.

soamipregnant · 11/01/2008 18:58

hi thanks ladies I have no idea when I ovulated to be honest

I will let you all know on mon afternoon when i get my next lot of test results so they should be approx 834 or more (double then)

my last period started nov 29th so maybe I am just very early preg this is what I am hoping rather than something like an ectopic obviously

xx

OP posts:
Kezza7779 · 14/01/2008 13:40

Hi so, any news? hope all is well xx

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 15:53

Hi got my levels today from 48 hours after the last one and they had almost doubled to
791 from 417 !

I had a bleed on sat eve but only small and i have no clue how long implantation bleeding can last??

thank you so much for enquiring
I am sorry i have been so up and down publically [vlush]

NatalieJane · 14/01/2008 15:54

I am so pleased for you

Take care xx

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 15:56

the dates I have are def right my last period started nov 29th no idea when I ovulated tho must have been late on?

I had 791 hcg levels on sun am

can anyone tell me how preg I am
I am all confused

I just cannot work out dates at the best of times let alone due to late ovulation

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 15:58

they are sort of indicating they are watching for en ectopic preg if they cant see anything in the womb soon...will keep you posted

how nerve wracking is conception / pregnancy!

NatalieJane · 14/01/2008 15:59

7 weeks on Thursday coming by my calculations!

Congrats!

NatalieJane · 14/01/2008 16:02

I might be wrong, but I don't think OV has anything to do with dates, I thought they always went from the first day of your last period? Which is how I got 7 weeks on Thursday.

It doesn't really matter that much (other than so you have an idea in your head), I have found they take the EDD from the dating scan - around 12 weeks - and they stick with that.

PortAndLemonaid · 14/01/2008 16:02

If this is a viable pregnancy progressing well then it seems most likely that you are around 5 weeks pregnant, i.e. would have ovulated around three weeks ago (very close to Christmas).

Are they going to do a repeat scan? I think ideally you'd want another scan in about a week to ten days, when if everything is going well you should be able to see something.

They may still be concerned about possible ectopic as it's a relatively slow rise (not terrible, but relatively slow).

PortAndLemonaid · 14/01/2008 16:07

NJ they normally work out dates based on last period date, because in most cases those are pretty much right. But in some cases those are clearly wrong (i.e. if soitlooks were seven weeks pregnant with a healthy viable pregnancy then she would have higher hCG levels and there would have been something on the scan) and the dates will be adjusted accordingly to match with what has actually been observed. In most cases the reason why the LMP date and the observed date are out will be because ovulation didn't ake place around day 14 but was significantly different from that. They don't normally specifically base the date on ovulation, though, you're right (unless you had some kind of fertility treatment) but if they give you a "you are x weeks pregnant" figure then they are effectively telling you "you ovulated (x-2) weeks ago".

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 16:09

ah i see! so even though I ovulated late potentially they would consider me 7 weeks preg though would date me at the 12 week scan properly

got ya now

though in reality I am only 3 weeks post conception or so....

I am trying to remember getting , erm, jiggy with it at christmas and it beats me(dh cant remember either) - it must have been memorable

so obviously as yet this little bundle in me doesnt prob have a heart beat as nothing has been detected so far

I am relly grateful for the advice/ support thank you xx

so maybe this bleeding on and off has been implantation bleeding i sort of though implantation bleeding was a one off but maybe not then until the bundle of cells is all settled in nicely

when exactly is implantation? am i past that stage? sorry being dim

PortAndLemonaid · 14/01/2008 16:16

Assuming they do another scan in a week or two, and assuming they find a viable embryo/fetus there, then they will probably adjust your EDD / how many weeks pregnant you are based on what they see there (will take measurements, feed into computer program, out will come "x weeks and x days pregnant"). Then they'll schedule your 12 week scan based on that estimate, and will potentially readjust your "how pregnant am I" figure again based on the 12 week acan.

Right now (sorry to be blunt) they don't have anything to indicate whether you are 5 weeks pregnant with a viable pregnancy or 7 weeks pregnant with an ectopic pregnancy/blighted ovum. Your blood test results are cautiously encouraging but don't tell you anything definite as to whic of the possibilities it is.

I've been roughly where you are now and the suspense is horrible... definitely thinking of you.

NatalieJane · 14/01/2008 16:25

Ahhhh, it all makes sense now, thanks Port!!!

You learn something new everyday

OracleInaCoracle · 14/01/2008 17:36

i really, really dont want to be the harbinger of doom here, but please dont get too excited. exactly the same thing happened to me last year hcg had pretty much doubled and i was told that pg was viable and my dates were wrong, i too had a scan where they saw a nice thick womb lining but no baby. it was only picked up when i had yet more bleeding (thick and dark) and i had another scan, but by then it was too late to save my tube. im probably wrong (god, i hope i am) and in 8m you will be making a birth announcement but if you feel unwell then go straight to a&e.

but tentative congratulations!

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 18:12

lissielou rather than see you as a bearer of doom it is good to hear from you

as i secretky am very perplexed my last two pregs have not been like this

can i ask did you bleed a few wee times and a big tuime before your tube burst and also how preg were you according to your LMP xx

can I ask what your symptoms pre your tube bursting were as I have symptoms but dont know if theyre normal or not???

thanks honey

hope you see this and post a reply

OracleInaCoracle · 14/01/2008 18:31

right, i got my bfp on the 21st jan but started bleeding on the 26th. my gp told me i was miscarrying, but i still felt pg. so i took a test which was a bfp. i had a scan at what should have been 5+5w and couldnt see anything in my womb, except for a nice thick lining and a bfp on docs test. i had blood taken and had to go back 2d later.

i rang up after the 2nd lot of bloods and the mw told me that my hcg had nearly doubled so it was a viable pg. i had been spotting this whole time on and off.

2d later i started bleeding again this time thick dark blood and they organised a scan for the 8th. i went in (i was 6+4) and there was bubba on my tube. well my tube had burst by then. i didnt have 1 sided pain or shoulder pain just awful mid-backache and headaches. i was v swollen and didnt feel right tbh. hth!

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 18:39

that sounds like me

in partic very swollen with aches

I am due tomorrow for bloods I will ask them if I can have a scan although they said it was just bloods tomorrow

thank you I am just not sure...... oh a hard one eh but defo on headache front too...

prob is i majorly want this baby!

soitlookslikeiampregthen · 14/01/2008 18:41

ps, that did help thank you

did you ever get levels back , can you remember what they were I know prob irrelevant but interested if you can remember xx