Okay fair play, but how do you actually support BFing if you take a neutral stance on it and don't suggest ways that people who think they can't BF actually could problem solve it? Because on threads like this, suggesting that there are ways around problems that a lot of people think are mutually exclusive with BFing and "made" them stop, is nasty and "unsupportive"
E.g. a woman in my group said she "had" to stop because she was only producing milk from one breast. Her child was growing fine and not unsettled, lots of nappies, but she was insistant that you can't nourish a child from just one breast. Biologically you can, and there were no other indications that her child needed any supplimentation, but she did and continues to tell lots of new and pregnant mums that she "had to" give formula because only one of her breasts worked.
I absolutely support her choice to not want to breastfeed any more, I have no issues with this, however, she has spread a lot of missinformation about "not being able to feed" to a lot of people I know.
She went to BF group for advice about weaning "because I"m not able to breastfeed". She didn't want to hear that she could actually continue to feed from just one breast, but was of course free to stop if she wanted to, she was very annoyed that this option was presented to her
So, do you A. not correct this missinformation that's being spread around the community (and the rest of the group who were listening)? or B. Give correct information to the community, which annoyed her because IMO she wanted "permission" to stop. I understand wanting to stop, but she wanted to hear that she "had" to stop so the decision wasn't on her, as it were.
The group would have supported her if she said "I'm fed up, I'm lobsided, I don't want to do it any more". But why should they support her insistance to spread misinformation?