Domesticgoddess (and Horton)
I wasn't trying to be self-congratulatory about DS's bladder, just trying to point out that it doesn't DAMAGE a child's bladder as was purported earlier in the thread.
And I agree that dry at age 2 is normal (or used to be) and certainly achievable.
However in my immediate circle of friends the 'norm' seems to more like 3-3.5 in the day and up to 6/7 at night.
"For what benefit?"
For us, once we had read about EC, it made sense in a "listen to your baby telling you something" way i.e he was pooing when we took his nappy off, so why not "catch" it in a potty rather than train him to poo in his (cloth) nappy.
Why ignore his cues if you can see them?
I think people have a false idea of ec as putting the baby on a potty at specific times to a rigid schedule and imposing it on the baby.
For us it was the opposite, it was more like breast-feeding, where you "know" when the baby needs feeding and you (rarely) feed to a schedule.
It also seemed frankly more hygenic and less messy for us to clean a potty rather than a sticky bottom and wash a cloth nappy.
TBH I think it's very hard to understand when you haven't experienced it yourself, but if you haven't, why start making claims about babies being "damaged" by going on a potty?