Funny thread. You would think after more than a year, people would have a better idea of what has happened and why.
"why i was against bailing them out in the first place"
If confidence stayed low and banks collapsed, what exactly were you planning to use in place of money?
"I used to work in the City and have nothing against fairly earned bonuses but none of these are fairly earned - they all depend entirely on tax payer bailouts"
If you have indeed worked in a financial institution before, you should know that (1) bonuses depend on departmental & personal targets (i.e. my deal earned corporate finance department £100mn, so I get £500K etc) and (2) most if not all top people have these bonuses written into their contracts, so that IF their work earned certain amount of money to the bank, they WILL get the % bonus defined in their legally binding employment contract, regardless of whether or not their bank received state aid. As such, they are "fairly earned" and legal bonuses.
"the very people who made the mess and are still being bailed out by the taxpayer, getting big payouts"
"Bankers" is not a single organism and not even a single business. If we are to point fingers, culprits would be commercial bankers who lent recklessly and cooker-uppers of complex financial products, but all that is a small minority of "bankers". Since both businesses have dried up to a trickle in the last 12 months, my guess would be that very few people in those businesses are still employed, and they didn't make enough money this year to get any bonuses (if it makes you feel better).
"the idea that the bankers are soooo clever and soooo talented that they simply MUST earn million pound bonuses"
Those who earn million £ bonuses do so not because they are clever, but because they bring in hundreds of millions in revenue.