@Pineneedlesincarpet - re your point about eating cake begin worse than sex trafficking here:
I was embarrassed for him. And surprised actually that a KC could react like this from basic questioning. Which I think was the problem for him. His reply to the questions about Doyle and Mandelson was "partygate". Which implies he thinks eating cake is worse than sex trafficking and paedophilia.
This is quite funny from Matthew Doyle.
https://archive.md/MKgpi
The whole thing is funny but on the party-gate riposte to Badenoch he said:
“The prime minister likes to claim he cares, but he only cares about victims when he’s trying to save his own skin,” Badenoch told him. “We saw it with Mandelson, with grooming gangs, and now we see it with Matthew Doyle.”
Starmer was predictably furious but his fury didn’t help. “She defended partygate for months and months and months,” he shouted.
When you’re bang to rights, it’s common in politics, though never wise, to point out that your opponent is worse than you are. It’s never wise because it’s not a denial, it’s an admission of guilt. This was like that, but worse. When you’re on the ropes over child sex offences, you can’t really return fire with an illegal cheese and wine party, but he tried it."
and on the temper losing reply to Davey:
“People in this country have been let down for years and years and years,” [Starmer] said, his teeth gnashing together as he did so. I only know that’s what he said because I’ve since checked the video. In the room no one heard a word. “One of the reasons was austerity, which his party supported. He should take responsibility and accountability for what he has inflicted on this country.”
That, in case you’re lost, is an apparently serious suggestion that Davey is in no position to question the prime minister, at prime minister’s questions, because of the economic policies of the coalition government 16 years ago."