Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Why would mumsnet leftists vote Green over reform?

351 replies

Wizeman · 17/01/2026 23:41

Now I have your attention

What are the substantive political reasons for voting for the Green Party over Reform UK?

Please avoid responses based on personality or tone (e.g., claims that one leader is “nicer” than the other). Instead, I am interested in clear policy-based arguments and ideological reasoning.
Reform UK is led by Nigel Farage, a businessman with a long-standing role in national politics. The Green Party is currently led by Zak Polanski, whose professional background includes work in theatre and as a hypnotist.

With that in mind, I would welcome serious explanations focused on policy positions, governance approach, economic strategy, and long-term outcomes, rather than personal character assessments.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Gall10 · 18/01/2026 10:57

Wizeman · 17/01/2026 23:49

Can you explain why their ideology is racist. Please back up your answer.

I assume you’re writing some sort of essay/dissertation about this. Fess up…tell us! Have you previously been caught using ChatGPT?
Please back up your answer!

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 10:59

Nat6999 · 18/01/2026 02:05

I don't agree with any of Reform's policies, they will take out the NHS, stop welfare benefits to the majority of claimants, leave the ECHR. They deny the holocaust & follow the Trump ideology.

I was a Labour party member until Rachel Reeves stopped the Winter Fuel Allowance & introduced the Family Farm Tax, I left in disgust & joined the Green Party instead, since Zack Polanski became leader they have given me hope that there is another way for our country to be run, membership is growing day by day, so many people are turning away from Labour.

What do you think of the green party policy to legalise all drugs?

OP posts:
Gall10 · 18/01/2026 10:59

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 00:28

Pretty good answer. What makes you think reform are anti disabled and women?

You’ve just about got your dissertation written for you now!

TheSmallAssassin · 18/01/2026 11:01

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 10:54

If you tax wealth they will leave. Also we dont need investment in the nhs we need 5 or 10 years of low migration so the infrastructure we are building can catch up.

Immigrants are not the ones causing the problems in the NHS. Migrants are generally young, fit and healthy, so not massive users of the NHS. They do staff it though!

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:02

Gall10 · 18/01/2026 10:57

I assume you’re writing some sort of essay/dissertation about this. Fess up…tell us! Have you previously been caught using ChatGPT?
Please back up your answer!

I do sometimes to quickly add any corrections but I haven't used it on this thread. Thanks

OP posts:
Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:04

TheSmallAssassin · 18/01/2026 11:01

Immigrants are not the ones causing the problems in the NHS. Migrants are generally young, fit and healthy, so not massive users of the NHS. They do staff it though!

Yes they are, it has nothing to do with the individual migrants but the high amount coming in legally and illegally.

OP posts:
bigboykitty · 18/01/2026 11:04

Surprised anyone's biting 😂. No chance.

NellieJean · 18/01/2026 11:06

Wizeman · 17/01/2026 23:49

Can you explain why their ideology is racist. Please back up your answer.

and write on one side of the paper only. Do you think your tone is ever so slightly off to the point I’d rather not engage with you.

TheSmallAssassin · 18/01/2026 11:08

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:04

Yes they are, it has nothing to do with the individual migrants but the high amount coming in legally and illegally.

I'm not saying it has anything to do with individuals either - if you look at immigrants as a group they are healthier than native people, so make less use of the NHS. The NHS also uses a lot of immigrant doctors and nurses, so they are contributing to the NHS.

Please back up your claim.

LoveSandbanks · 18/01/2026 11:11

I’m not entering into any debate with someone who uses the term “leftists”.

the reform party want to take us out of the echr which will remove us from the working time directive, along with such things as equality between spouses. They want to move the NHS to a US style insurance based system. Some in the party are talking about limiting women’s access to abortion in the style of America.

I’ve never voted Green but as a left leaning voter I’d place my vote ANYWHERE but with reform.

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:11

Frequency · 18/01/2026 01:58

Whilst I would prefer plans to help people off addictive substances, legalising them gives the opportunity to tax them and ensure they're pure and not tainted with rat poison. It's not a bad idea in theory, but I'd need to look into more to decide if the Greens plan to implement it properly, i.e., do they mean legalise and control it, as in you could pop into a chemist to buy a gram of speed, or do they mean just ignoring it?

Also, imagine the tax you could raise from weed farmers? One decent crop can be worth tens of thousands.

All you need to do is look and see if it has worked anywhere else. They did it in Portugal and after 10 years they are scrambling to do a u turn.

OP posts:
Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:15

TheSmallAssassin · 18/01/2026 11:08

I'm not saying it has anything to do with individuals either - if you look at immigrants as a group they are healthier than native people, so make less use of the NHS. The NHS also uses a lot of immigrant doctors and nurses, so they are contributing to the NHS.

Please back up your claim.

My point pretty simple, if 500k people enter the country each year, you need to build the infrastructure for 500k people each year, to build infrastructure for 500k people can cost from 50 to 100 billion. I dont mind migrants working in the nhs, but everyone entering the country is a doctor or nurse. I want a migration model of 10k net with high skilled professionals entering, such as surgeons and doctors.

OP posts:
Pinkissmart · 18/01/2026 11:18

So, OP, you’re not in favour of immigration for humanitarian reasons?

TheSmallAssassin · 18/01/2026 11:18

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:15

My point pretty simple, if 500k people enter the country each year, you need to build the infrastructure for 500k people each year, to build infrastructure for 500k people can cost from 50 to 100 billion. I dont mind migrants working in the nhs, but everyone entering the country is a doctor or nurse. I want a migration model of 10k net with high skilled professionals entering, such as surgeons and doctors.

Where's the evidence that we need to build infrastructure to match migration though? The whole point is that it's not a straight line graph, your "simple point" is too simplistic and not borne up by reality.

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:20

Holdonforsummer · 18/01/2026 10:51

Are you from the Reform PR department, OP? No rationale, compassionate leftist person would ever vote Reform. We don’t need to ‘back up’ our answers.

This is why labour are in power, they didn't back up there answers yet people voted for them. No substance.

OP posts:
MadamCholetsbonnet · 18/01/2026 11:21

Reform is the Racist Party

parietal · 18/01/2026 11:21

Because climate change is real and we need politicians to actually do something about it

crackofdoom · 18/01/2026 11:21

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 10:54

If you tax wealth they will leave. Also we dont need investment in the nhs we need 5 or 10 years of low migration so the infrastructure we are building can catch up.

You're stating opinion as fact there. As far as I know, there is little evidence that taxing wealth causes an exodus of the rich in Western countries.

Stopping immigration to protect the NHS would have little effect, and could end up being counterproductive. The demographic pressure that the NHS is facing is largely caused by our own ageing population, and to imply otherwise is deeply harmful. You need to correctly identify a problem before you can solve it.

Seaitoverthere · 18/01/2026 11:21

Not particularly left wing, more centre. I’d vote Green over Reform, I’d vote anyone over Reform. Threads like these are not helping Reform’s case I personally feel and just piss lots of people off and put them off Reform even more.

Meadowfinch · 18/01/2026 11:22

I couldn't vote for either. If either were elected, I wouldn't jump ship & emigrate though. I'd stay right here and fight to get them kicked out as soon as humanly possible.

BillieWiper · 18/01/2026 11:22

I would never ever vote for reform so would vote for the party most likely defeat them that was sufficiently on the left to align with my beliefs. If that was Green then I'd do it.

Frequency · 18/01/2026 11:23

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:11

All you need to do is look and see if it has worked anywhere else. They did it in Portugal and after 10 years they are scrambling to do a u turn.

Are they? I did a quick Google last night, and on first glance, addiction rates seem steady, drug deaths, HIV, and crime are all down and significantly lower than in EU countries, including the UK, whose drug death rate is rapidly increasing.

It seems to be working quite well for Portugal.

You keep asking people to back up their claims while apparently pulling facts out of your arse. Maybe link some reports/studies to back up your own claims?

Wizeman · 18/01/2026 11:23

TheSmallAssassin · 18/01/2026 11:18

Where's the evidence that we need to build infrastructure to match migration though? The whole point is that it's not a straight line graph, your "simple point" is too simplistic and not borne up by reality.

Edited

Not enough houses, higher energy bills because of more demand from less energy plants, long nhs waiting lists, pot holes in your roads. That's some of the basic ones. This is the"reality". Dont tell me your a pothole denier!

OP posts:
Thortour · 18/01/2026 11:24

Leftists? What in the Tufton Road BS is this?

LilyCanna · 18/01/2026 11:26

Wizeman · 17/01/2026 23:52

Surely brexit gives the uk control of itself? That was the point right? So Surely its the fault of the government for not taking advantage of their new found freedom and sovereignty?

Brexit introduced trading barriers between the UK and its biggest trading partner. This has been (as everyone sensible knew it would be) very damaging to the UK economy with no obvious benefit. There was no way the government could have delivered Brexit that would have been better than what we had before.
For some reason people are prepared to give credibility to the person who sold this crap idea to voters rather than him slinking off in shame and embarrassment.