Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Luxury cars removed from the motability scheme

1000 replies

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:33

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

too little too late. As a full time worker I can’t afford to run a car, let alone a luxury car. Motability should be a standard car - available in automatic and manual, an option for wheelchair users, and that’s it.

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

The programme has been criticised for allowing people with non-visible disabilities to get luxury vehicles as part of their welfare. The chancellor wants to support the British car market with the new measures.

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:21

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:06

There may be some specific exceptions but for the majority other brands are more appropriate. Functionality should be the primary objective. Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items.

More appropriate in what way?

phantomofthepopera · 25/11/2025 13:21

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:13

Its a humongous advance - Why is this money not being put to better use?

Fuck me. Just fuck me. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Have you ever had a holiday, or bought yourself a lipstick? Why are you not putting your money to better use?

LupaMoonhowl · 25/11/2025 13:22

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:16

People have this amazing thing called choice. They can choose what to wear, what to eat, where to go...and what to spend THEIR OWN MONEY on.

But they can spend it on their care -should not be expecting taxpayer ‘funding’ if the can fund themselves.

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 13:22

Almondflour · 25/11/2025 12:46

If I ever lost my legs I certainly would be happy with a subsidised Nissan micra and not unhappy about the fact that I can’t get an Audi.

last thing I’d care about is what make my car is as long as I can get from point a to b safely

Good for you but some people have different preferences to you. As already stated, it’s of no increase cost to anyone aside from the individual so it’s moot as to what you would or wouldn’t want

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:24

Are we really going back to 1834 Poor Law and the doctrine of less eligibility? I can't believe the petty minded jealousy on here. I really thought the world had moved on, well it did for a while but now we go backwards.

Frequency · 25/11/2025 13:24

@NorthXNorthWest I don't think you understand how the scheme works. The huge advance being paid for luxury cars is paid by the disabled person from their own salary (and it will be a salary because no disability benefit pays enough for a BMW, no matter what you've read in the Fail).

In effect, what is happening is that the driver is paying for the car, and the scheme is paying for/facilitating the adaptations needed.

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:26

FollowingAzureSeas · 25/11/2025 13:18

How many people here claim child benefit, but would buy a Boden (insert any other aspirational brand) coat for their child. Why aren't you buying cheaper supermarket clothes for your child?

I did and do, its called living within your means. Just like the millions of people driving smaller cars or mid market brands because they have to put functionality over brand desirability.

Supermarket clothing isn't the problem. It's people with snobbery based value judgements...

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:26

LupaMoonhowl · 25/11/2025 13:22

But they can spend it on their care -should not be expecting taxpayer ‘funding’ if the can fund themselves.

My husband doesn't have a motability car but he could due to his disability. He could afford it as I do his care for free, he chooses to buy a car but he still gets the same amount for his mobility as someone who chooses a luxury motability car

19lottie82 · 25/11/2025 13:29

Does a “luxury” mobility car cost the tax payer more than a basic one? After all they have to pay more from their own pocket, not PIP / DLA.

If not, then what’s the problem?

Gingerkittykat · 25/11/2025 13:29

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:45

but the “weekly leasing charge” is £77 a week, or £240 a month. Leasing a Merc or other luxury car would cost a lot more than that. My mum’s Yaris is £500 a month for crying out loud

£77 a week is £333 a month or ££4003 a year.

Where is your mum leasing her Yaris from? What model?

I lease a basic motability Yaris (which is an amazing car!). A lease on my model would cost £348 per month. Is she buying instead of leasing?

https://www.arnoldclarkleasing.com/toyota-car-lease-deals/personal/yaris/hatchback-1-5-hybrid-icon-5dr-cvt/

I've just googled Mercedes on the motabiliy website and the only model is the Vito which has a £38995 upfront payment, which is around £1000 amonth on a 3 year lease!

Toyota Yaris Hatchback 1.5 Hybrid Icon 5dr CVT Car Leasing Deals - Arnold Clark

Get the best deal on a Toyota Yaris Hatchback 1.5 Hybrid Icon 5dr CVT - Arnold Clark

https://www.arnoldclarkleasing.com/toyota-car-lease-deals/personal/yaris/hatchback-1-5-hybrid-icon-5dr-cvt/

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:30

LupaMoonhowl · 25/11/2025 13:22

But they can spend it on their care -should not be expecting taxpayer ‘funding’ if the can fund themselves.

No government or taxpayer is funding free BMWs/Mercedes or anything like that. Many disabled people have free care provided by loved ones because there is no money for care. Many loved ones of disabled people have been forced to give up work to care for them because of the shit-show that is the care system (not even a cost issue - an availability issue).

How does that translate to disabled people not being allowed to use their own money to lease a car of their choice (from the limited options - can't be just any car of your choosing).

LeastOfMyWorries · 25/11/2025 13:30

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:16

How about we stop child benefit and give out basic food parcels instead? Why should a parent be entitled to go and spend that money on whatever they want?

Not nice is it

Exactly this. As a mum of a disabled young adult who will never work I don’t think I’ve ever been more afraid for his future than I am reading the attitudes on this thread. So many people who. Probably consider themselves reasonable people, voters, who are so happy to spout such bile. I buy him Nike trainers- is he being judged? Should he wear supermarket or Primark? Do people think it’s ok to have such opinions on how disabled people live?

Kreepture · 25/11/2025 13:30

tartanhaggis7 · 25/11/2025 12:15

i agree with most of the comments!! i can remember when diabled people drove about in greenish 3 wheelers ( like del boy) i think they were called a reliant robin praticle / low consumption / easy to park but on neg side u were a moving advert that u were disabled ! i don't know if any money is involved but they should be given an ford focus basic model if they want to upgrade then they pay SIMPLES😎😎😎

ftr, i'm disabled, like, physically disabled, i am entitled to a Motability car should i choose to, i currently don't, my own car suffices for now... but you know something? I just had to SELL my 'basic Ford Focus' and replace it with this one because i can no longer drive my Focus because of my disability... the steering on them is too heavy and the driving position aggravates my spine and hip, its also too hard to get in/out of now.

So your suggestion is fucking stupid. You cannot have one car for all, it doesn't work, everyones disability needs and requirements are different, and different vehicles are needed to suit need.

Julen7 · 25/11/2025 13:31

19lottie82 · 25/11/2025 13:29

Does a “luxury” mobility car cost the tax payer more than a basic one? After all they have to pay more from their own pocket, not PIP / DLA.

If not, then what’s the problem?

It was pointed out on a discussion on this I was listening to earlier that top end cars cost more in servicing, tax, repairs, insurance etc. All this is included under the Motability scheme

MaturingCheeseball · 25/11/2025 13:31

Insurance and tax are free - insurance on a high-end vehicle will be ££££, depending on driver’s age and location.

It’s not “petty-minded jealousy” it’s about fairness. And using public money well.

Many conditions should not qualify. I do have a relative with a motability car for - yes - anxiety. It’s ludicrous because I honestly can’t fathom why they need it seeing as they go on public transport, planes etc.

Mysticmaud · 25/11/2025 13:31

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:44

But still subsidised!

Not subsidised. Mobility is a charity.
Mobility higher rate is given to physically disabled people only. It can be used for a wheelchair or car.

BackToLurk · 25/11/2025 13:34

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:21

More appropriate in what way?

More appropriate in a “know your place” kind of way?

PandoraSocks · 25/11/2025 13:34

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:19

What's 'wow' about that. It's perfectly possible to have a nice car that is not a Mercedes. No person disabled or not has the right to aspirational items they cannot afford. There is almost always a reasonably priced alternative.

But they can afford it. They can afford the massive down-payment. And then they can afford the weekly lease payments. It is no skin off the tax-payers' nose which car they choose to lease.

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:35

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:26

I did and do, its called living within your means. Just like the millions of people driving smaller cars or mid market brands because they have to put functionality over brand desirability.

Supermarket clothing isn't the problem. It's people with snobbery based value judgements...

What is there to suggest someone who has £7k available for an upfront payment isn't living within their means?

Disabled people can earn money you know. It might shock you, but disabled people are allowed jobs! Revolutionary, I know. 🙄

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 13:35

PandoraSocks · 25/11/2025 13:34

But they can afford it. They can afford the massive down-payment. And then they can afford the weekly lease payments. It is no skin off the tax-payers' nose which car they choose to lease.

The weekly lease payments that are paid by the government?

if you have enough money to be making huge down payments for a car you probably have enough money to support yourself?

OP posts:
Tryingtokeepgoing · 25/11/2025 13:36

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:18

Well those of a jealous disposition wouldnt need to feel jealous because let's face it this is about jealousy.

Absolutely. And all over £77 a week, plus however much someone wants to spend their own money. Imagine limiting those on Universal Credit to shopping in Lidl, Aldi, Asda or Tesco only. And no branded goods . The new Digital ID will let them do that😂

It's easy enough to limit the number of Motability cars by tightening up the eligibility criteria for higher rate PIP / DLA. You could further save money by removing the VAT exemption from any unmodified vehicle. But, that would be (a) to understand how the scheme works and (b) be willing to do something about it.

Easier to whip up a storm and make up policy on the fly, driven by public opinion. This Government is worse than Farage for populist polices in some ways!!

BrownTroutBluesAgain · 25/11/2025 13:36

phantomofthepopera · 25/11/2025 12:37

I think you’re confusing the number of people on higher rate PIP. According to Motabilty, 840,000 people use the scheme. The most common motability vehicles are a Peugeot 208, Nissan Juke and Vauxhall Corsa. Are these too posh?

Or are you saying that nobody should get help if they are disabled?

I just googled the number who used the motility scheme and that’s the figure I was given with an explanation🤷

if it’s 840,000 then the figure is just under

£3.4billion

Tryingtokeepgoing · 25/11/2025 13:38

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 13:35

The weekly lease payments that are paid by the government?

if you have enough money to be making huge down payments for a car you probably have enough money to support yourself?

PIP is not means tested. The government pays the PIP. What the recipient does with it is up to them :)

x2boys · 25/11/2025 13:38

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:19

What's 'wow' about that. It's perfectly possible to have a nice car that is not a Mercedes. No person disabled or not has the right to aspirational items they cannot afford. There is almost always a reasonably priced alternative.

Why do you care so much ,everyone who receives HRM gets the same payment of £ 77/ week ,/they can either choose to use the mobility, scheme to either fund or part fund a car ,the more expensive a model it is the more advance payment theu are putting c down themselves. ,
Or they can use the £77 to buy their own car
Or use it for taxi,s etc

They arexstill only getting £77 / week whatever their preference.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 13:38

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:09

"Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items."

Wow. Just wow.

I know! Who knew a WAV was aspirational!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread