Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Luxury cars removed from the motability scheme

1000 replies

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:33

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

too little too late. As a full time worker I can’t afford to run a car, let alone a luxury car. Motability should be a standard car - available in automatic and manual, an option for wheelchair users, and that’s it.

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

The programme has been criticised for allowing people with non-visible disabilities to get luxury vehicles as part of their welfare. The chancellor wants to support the British car market with the new measures.

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:06

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 12:42

Can you find a vehicle suitable for a large and heavy power chair, two children in car seats and a second adult? His last van was a ford, the one now available doesn’t have the correct roof height, nor did a VW, the other option was a mercedes van. So I would be quite surprised if you could find somewhere an adaptation specialist couldn’t.

There may be some specific exceptions but for the majority other brands are more appropriate. Functionality should be the primary objective. Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items.

Sahara123 · 25/11/2025 13:09

RMAC67 · 25/11/2025 13:06

People pay the excess of thousands of pounds for these cars. Why should a disabled person not drive whatever the f they want?!

I’m so sick of people with no physical disability, crying about disability benefits.
Count yourself lucky for your good health OP,
100% of people with a disability would chose good health over the ‘luxury’ of a car. Remember that 👍

Absolutely. My daughter will never work, have a family or even live independently. I’d swap the car for her life to be normal, for want of a better word

Julen7 · 25/11/2025 13:09

Just heard the end of a discussion on notability cars on Jeremy Vine. Was surprised to hear ex DWP doctor state that the whole notability scheme whilst he was working there was wide open to abuse.

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:09

"Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items."

Wow. Just wow.

x2boys · 25/11/2025 13:09

1apenny2apenny · 25/11/2025 12:36

Good, they should have never been included. Now to be stricter about who gets one. People with mind anxiety and adhd should not be getting a car and yes I do know someone in this situation. For all those saying it doesn’t cost the tax payer: can I have a car that is taxed, serviced, insured, has breakdown cover etc for £77 a week with a few grand down payment please so that my son can get to work? Also can my younger child do their test at 16 please so he can drive sooner. I can’t can I because the fact is this - it does cost the taxpayer, a lot.

No you don't
Absolutely nobody is getting a mobility car for mild anxiety stop talking bollocks 🙄

Frequency · 25/11/2025 13:10

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:06

There may be some specific exceptions but for the majority other brands are more appropriate. Functionality should be the primary objective. Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items.

No, but being able to afford to pay for aspirational items does. Which is exactly how the motability scheme works. If you want luxury, you pay for it.

Why should disabled higher earners be excluded from having nice things just because they need adaptations because of their disability?

FollowingAzureSeas · 25/11/2025 13:11

Tryingtokeepgoing · 25/11/2025 12:48

The residual has not been funded by the disabled person - that makes no sense. It's funded by the second had market being willing to pay more for a BMW than a BYD Dolphin.

The disabled person has paid an extra up front payment for the car with the better residual (luxury car). They will not get that money back, but mobility benefits from the luxury car resale.

AgnesX · 25/11/2025 13:12

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

What bit of "not giving" don't you understand. Its a humongous advance. And if you also look, the models might be BMW/Mercedes but they're not the top models by any stretch.

Anyway the mean minded of your ilk have got their way. Next you'll be shouting for them to go back to reliant robins.

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:12

MrsSlocombesCat · 25/11/2025 12:44

Yes because disabled people don't deserve anything nice. Honestly listen to yourselves. Imagine not being able to walk and being begrudged a nice car. Besides which if you're entitled to a Mobility car you have to pay extra for an upmarket one. These cars are not 'given out' they're paid for from the mobility component of your award. And no, I'm not disabled myself, I just think that people who are deserve something nice in their lives.

You don't think having access to a vehicle is a nice thing? Is only nice if it is an aspirational brand?

That sounds more like greed than gratitude that a scheme exists at all.

FollowingAzureSeas · 25/11/2025 13:12

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:09

"Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items."

Wow. Just wow.

Indeed.

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:12

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

No one was giving them out. People's mobility allowance paid the monthly fee, if you wanted a luxury model you paid the advance payment. This will save tax payers exactly zero pence.

IsawwhatIsaw · 25/11/2025 13:13

The CEO of Motability received nearly 750,000 remuneration last year.
the whole scheme needs looking at .
Of course people with health issues need safe cars which are appropriate for their needs.
But whether those needs include obtaining such expensive brands and models seems questionable when those funding it can’t afford such choices.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 25/11/2025 13:13

Julen7 · 25/11/2025 13:09

Just heard the end of a discussion on notability cars on Jeremy Vine. Was surprised to hear ex DWP doctor state that the whole notability scheme whilst he was working there was wide open to abuse.

Surely it's the whole PIP / DLA system that's open to abuse? Not Motability. Since you can't access Motability without those benefits. Once you qualify, does it matter if it's spent on a Nissan Joke, or A BMW X1 via Motability, a taxi or a home help every day to wheel you around in a wheelchair?

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:13

AgnesX · 25/11/2025 13:12

What bit of "not giving" don't you understand. Its a humongous advance. And if you also look, the models might be BMW/Mercedes but they're not the top models by any stretch.

Anyway the mean minded of your ilk have got their way. Next you'll be shouting for them to go back to reliant robins.

Its a humongous advance - Why is this money not being put to better use?

phantomofthepopera · 25/11/2025 13:14

HelpMeGetThrough · 25/11/2025 12:54

But they certainly don’t need a BMW or a Merc to get around and I say that as a disabled person.

Nobody ‘needs’ a posh car. But why shouldn’t they if they’re paying for them themselves (which they are)? Are we a communist state?

Do people truly believe that a disabled person shouldn’t have anything better than ‘basic’ just because they’re disabled?

LupaMoonhowl · 25/11/2025 13:14

If they can afford the uplift they should not be ‘entitled’ to a Motability car /they can just lease a basic model themselves.

Frequency · 25/11/2025 13:15

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:13

Its a humongous advance - Why is this money not being put to better use?

Because the people earning the money want to spend it on a car? What do you think they should be spending their own money on?

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:16

How about we stop child benefit and give out basic food parcels instead? Why should a parent be entitled to go and spend that money on whatever they want?

Not nice is it

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:16

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:13

Its a humongous advance - Why is this money not being put to better use?

People have this amazing thing called choice. They can choose what to wear, what to eat, where to go...and what to spend THEIR OWN MONEY on.

TheignT · 25/11/2025 13:18

Tryingtokeepgoing · 25/11/2025 13:13

Surely it's the whole PIP / DLA system that's open to abuse? Not Motability. Since you can't access Motability without those benefits. Once you qualify, does it matter if it's spent on a Nissan Joke, or A BMW X1 via Motability, a taxi or a home help every day to wheel you around in a wheelchair?

Well those of a jealous disposition wouldnt need to feel jealous because let's face it this is about jealousy.

FollowingAzureSeas · 25/11/2025 13:18

How many people here claim child benefit, but would buy a Boden (insert any other aspirational brand) coat for their child. Why aren't you buying cheaper supermarket clothes for your child?

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:19

LupaMoonhowl · 25/11/2025 13:14

If they can afford the uplift they should not be ‘entitled’ to a Motability car /they can just lease a basic model themselves.

Edited

Yeah... doesn't matter that you can't drive it with only one leg or can't get into it with a wheelchair. You can afford it so that's that!

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:19

Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:09

"Bottom line is that having a disability doesn't give someone the right to aspirational items."

Wow. Just wow.

What's 'wow' about that. It's perfectly possible to have a nice car that is not a Mercedes. No person disabled or not has the right to aspirational items they cannot afford. There is almost always a reasonably priced alternative.

ccquad · 25/11/2025 13:19

Hameth · 25/11/2025 10:36

If a car is needed, the standard model is fine. If you can afford the top up, then you dont need the subsidy. The luxury cars are sometimes driven by relatives who acess the scheme but the intended recipient gets an occasional lift. Car dealers apply very light checks. Definitely one to cut

  1. Could you tell me how I get my electric wheelchair in a standard model? My husband drives my motability car as I don't drive since I became a quadruple amputee. You have shown your ableism very succinctly in your 3 sentence post - congratulations.
Yesimmoaningaboutbenefits · 25/11/2025 13:21

NorthXNorthWest · 25/11/2025 13:19

What's 'wow' about that. It's perfectly possible to have a nice car that is not a Mercedes. No person disabled or not has the right to aspirational items they cannot afford. There is almost always a reasonably priced alternative.

They're using their own money to pay for it. If they couldn't afford it, they wouldn't have it.

What is so difficult about that to understand????

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.