Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Luxury cars removed from the motability scheme

1000 replies

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:33

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

too little too late. As a full time worker I can’t afford to run a car, let alone a luxury car. Motability should be a standard car - available in automatic and manual, an option for wheelchair users, and that’s it.

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

The programme has been criticised for allowing people with non-visible disabilities to get luxury vehicles as part of their welfare. The chancellor wants to support the British car market with the new measures.

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
GreenSedan · 25/11/2025 09:34

Its amazing that they were ever included.

Overthebow · 25/11/2025 09:35

Yes I agree. The scheme is needed but no way should Mercedes and BMWs have been included in it.

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:35

I don’t think people understand the huge advance payment that had to be paid for these cars. They weren’t just giving out luxury cars for free!!!!

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:37

The advance payments are non refundable as well.

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 09:37

Surely it was money towards a more luxury car though? Like an upgrade version so the expense is on the individual to pay the difference?

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:38

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 09:37

Surely it was money towards a more luxury car though? Like an upgrade version so the expense is on the individual to pay the difference?

Yes the ‘luxury’ cars had higher advance payments.

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:35

I don’t think people understand the huge advance payment that had to be paid for these cars. They weren’t just giving out luxury cars for free!!!!

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 09:38

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:35

I don’t think people understand the huge advance payment that had to be paid for these cars. They weren’t just giving out luxury cars for free!!!!

Let’s not let the truth get in the way of good benefit bashing thread now come on!

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:42

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

Maybe go and look at the huge advance payments required for these type of cars - often awards to qualify aren’t for that long. You have to also give up your PIP mobility part each week for the scheme. So a huge non refundable advance payment and a weekly leasing charge. It’s not a free car . You sound jealous that disabled people had a choice.

ChristmasTimeChristmasJoy · 25/11/2025 09:43

I wish people would get into their thick heads that they aren’t giving these cars away for free. Its no different to leasing a car.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:44

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:35

I don’t think people understand the huge advance payment that had to be paid for these cars. They weren’t just giving out luxury cars for free!!!!

But still subsidised!

OP posts:
twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:44

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

I have to say as well I don’t have the facts and figures but I’m sure there was some kind of profit being made somehow with the motability scheme and these big advance payments etc ? Good for the economy maybe or perhaps there’s a CEO or someone getting paid a lot but let’s just continue to have a go at disabled people

WiggyWiggyImGettingJiggy · 25/11/2025 09:44

You're so right, bloody disabled people, having something nice, that they pay a hefty amount towards, ugh.

They should get a skateboard and live on gruel.

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:45

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:44

But still subsidised!

God forbid we help disabled people get around. Shall we do away with the freedom pass too or are you ok with free public transport for disabled people ?

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:45

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:42

Maybe go and look at the huge advance payments required for these type of cars - often awards to qualify aren’t for that long. You have to also give up your PIP mobility part each week for the scheme. So a huge non refundable advance payment and a weekly leasing charge. It’s not a free car . You sound jealous that disabled people had a choice.

but the “weekly leasing charge” is £77 a week, or £240 a month. Leasing a Merc or other luxury car would cost a lot more than that. My mum’s Yaris is £500 a month for crying out loud

OP posts:
AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:45

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:45

God forbid we help disabled people get around. Shall we do away with the freedom pass too or are you ok with free public transport for disabled people ?

I said it should be a standard car.

OP posts:
twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:46

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:45

but the “weekly leasing charge” is £77 a week, or £240 a month. Leasing a Merc or other luxury car would cost a lot more than that. My mum’s Yaris is £500 a month for crying out loud

The advance payments all vary depending on the car. Is your mum disabled though or are you comparing the wrong things.

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 09:46

zurigo · 25/11/2025 09:38

You're missing the point. They shouldn't have been giving out luxury cars AT ALL!!! If you require a car because you are disabled there should be basic cars available - nothing fancy or flash or luxurious - just safe and reliable and inexpensive. There are plenty of cars that fit that description.

So someone who is born with no legs and is entitled to use the mobility scheme shouldn’t be able to get a ‘luxury’ car even though they pay the difference between the basic and ‘luxury’, so the extra ‘luxury’ is at their own expense?

Or maybe they aren’t allowed to have savings to put towards the ‘luxury’?

You’re very much missing the point!! They were born with a huge disadvantage so the government goes some way to try to make the playing fields a bit more even. I bet you wouldn’t swap!!

Honest to Christ, some people on here have no idea that they could lose limbs at any point then they’d soon thing differently. Weee all only one car accident, a bad cut causing sepsis etc away from being ok that situation. No one knows what’s around the corner

Frequency · 25/11/2025 09:46

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Isouf · 25/11/2025 09:46

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 09:37

Surely it was money towards a more luxury car though? Like an upgrade version so the expense is on the individual to pay the difference?

But that doesn't make sense though. So someone is getting help from the government to buy a car (which i agree is essential these days)...and then off you go to put extra money you have to drive a fancy car?!
Surely you would keep that extra money in savings for future use related with the disability that led you to ask government for help in the 1st place.

A car is essential, a luxury car is not.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:47

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:46

The advance payments all vary depending on the car. Is your mum disabled though or are you comparing the wrong things.

I’m comparing what anyone else would have to pay for a non-luxury car. It’s a heavily subsided scheme and it shouldn’t provide a better standard of life than most people in the UK can afford.

OP posts:
LemograssLollipop · 25/11/2025 09:47

I welcome removing the luxury cars and promoting British made cars on the scheme. Of course this should be the case, push cars made here and secure jobs for those working in the industry.

But why have they set the bar at 25% and not higher? Can anyone explain this?

And how is the remaining 75% of supply made up? I am guessing the proportion of the luxury brands available on this scheme would be relatively small? If you are receiving PIP and not working, how do you fund the additional payment?

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:47

Isouf · 25/11/2025 09:46

But that doesn't make sense though. So someone is getting help from the government to buy a car (which i agree is essential these days)...and then off you go to put extra money you have to drive a fancy car?!
Surely you would keep that extra money in savings for future use related with the disability that led you to ask government for help in the 1st place.

A car is essential, a luxury car is not.

PIP / DLA are not means tested

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:48

Perhaps it is Andrew Miller you want to be directing your shock at . With that salary and bonuses I wonder what he drives ?

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:49

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:47

PIP / DLA are not means tested

So?

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread