Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Luxury cars removed from the motability scheme

1000 replies

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:33

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

too little too late. As a full time worker I can’t afford to run a car, let alone a luxury car. Motability should be a standard car - available in automatic and manual, an option for wheelchair users, and that’s it.

Luxury cars removed from Motability scheme ahead of budget

The programme has been criticised for allowing people with non-visible disabilities to get luxury vehicles as part of their welfare. The chancellor wants to support the British car market with the new measures.

https://news.sky.com/story/luxury-cars-removed-from-motability-scheme-ahead-of-budget-13475029

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
YaWeeFurryBastard · 25/11/2025 10:16

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 10:10

It is by some people. They don’t want to see or hear of anyone getting what they perceive as ‘more’ than them, including disabled people. Being disabled isn’t a choice and I’m sure the majority of them would chose to not have their disability

I’d absolutely love for disabled people to get a healthy amount of benefits (I’ve never received any myself, which is fine and I’m lucky I don’t need them). But unfortunately given the state of the economy I’d much rather the money went towards improving the lives of disabled people who are barely scraping by instead of funding cars for those who can afford them without help.

colorpie · 25/11/2025 10:16

I feel sorry really for disabled people right now who rely on Motability help, PIP and so on. The knives are out for their essential benefits and the harpies (as evidenced by this thread) cannot wait to descend and kick them when they are down even when they don't have a proper grasp on how these benefits work. Human nature can be so ugly.

phantomofthepopera · 25/11/2025 10:16

DisforDarkChocolate · 25/11/2025 10:13

What I find confusing is that someone who can afford the significant down payment needed for a high end car needs government funding.

Disabled people don’t get benefits because they’re poor, they get them because they’re disabled. Disability benefits are not means tested. It’s not confusing at all, it’s quite simple.

Frequency · 25/11/2025 10:17

DisforDarkChocolate · 25/11/2025 10:13

What I find confusing is that someone who can afford the significant down payment needed for a high end car needs government funding.

In a lot of cases, people with higher incomes are choosing motability because it reduces the cost of the adaptations needed for the car. Someone on a high income might be able to afford to lease a BMW from a "normal" supplier, but try finding a BMW adapted for someone unable to use their legs without going through Motability.

No one is being given a free car.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 10:17

crumpet · 25/11/2025 10:13

If a person can afford a higher payment, then the question is why the tax payer should contribute at all. At that stage it is not a necessity which needs to be supported by the tax payer.

They don’t have a choice, unless you want people trapped in their homes. My friend has no choice but to pay for adaptions which included being able to remain in his wheelchair in his car, hand controls, sliding doors, an automatic boot opening etc. If he didn’t pay for his wheelchair he wouldn’t be able to leave his own bedroom, he cannot self propel, but apparently thats fine and he isn’t worthy of leaving a room on his own.

crumpet · 25/11/2025 10:17

Burnnoticed · 25/11/2025 10:15

Because we have decided as a country to support people who don't start on a level playing field.

Surely in a time of austerity we should focus on financial support to those who need it. I don’t think anyone would object to helping people who need specialist vehicles being supported to have them.

Sahara123 · 25/11/2025 10:18

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:35

I don’t think people understand the huge advance payment that had to be paid for these cars. They weren’t just giving out luxury cars for free!!!!

Exactly. Woe betide any disabled person might have something nice to drive ! They don’t just give out BMW’s , if you decide that’s what you want there’s several thousands in advance payments to hand over.
We have a motability car, a fairly bog standard Renault, even that had an advance payment, which was our choice of course.

olderandnonthewiser · 25/11/2025 10:19

Burnnoticed · 25/11/2025 10:15

Because we have decided as a country to support people who don't start on a level playing field.

The question is do they need that support. Or would the money be better spent on those who need it more

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:20

Sahara123 · 25/11/2025 10:18

Exactly. Woe betide any disabled person might have something nice to drive ! They don’t just give out BMW’s , if you decide that’s what you want there’s several thousands in advance payments to hand over.
We have a motability car, a fairly bog standard Renault, even that had an advance payment, which was our choice of course.

Woe betide any working person wants a decent car? Oh we have to pull ourselves up by our boot straps and scrimp and save for one

OP posts:
YorkshireGoldDrinker · 25/11/2025 10:20

The scheme should be for people who can't get about any other way and cannot afford a car.

Genuine need doesn't care about the brand. A car is a car. If people claiming PIP complain about this, then are they really and truly in need of a car and can't afford one? Or can they get by with a car and be grateful they're being given one in the first place?

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 10:20

YaWeeFurryBastard · 25/11/2025 10:16

I’d absolutely love for disabled people to get a healthy amount of benefits (I’ve never received any myself, which is fine and I’m lucky I don’t need them). But unfortunately given the state of the economy I’d much rather the money went towards improving the lives of disabled people who are barely scraping by instead of funding cars for those who can afford them without help.

That’s a fair point and I agree more money should be available for those with disabilities absolutely. That’s you’re genuine concern, but a lot of people don’t give a crap about disabled peope at all and aren’t bothered about helping the poorer ones either.

Politicians247UnderwearExtinguishingService · 25/11/2025 10:21

So if we're saying that disabled people getting financial assistance from the state to go towards mitigating the extra challenges and costs that they face should only get the very cheapest option possible and be grateful for it... what on earth are we doing paying child benefit as money into parents' bank accounts for them to spend as appropriate?

Surely this should be replaced with vouchers for Farm Foods ultra basic range foodstuffs - even for people who don't live anywhere near a branch of Farm Foods - and then only redeemable against items considered as 'absolutely essential' for survival from starving.

Why should MY taxes pay for YOUR child to eat anything that brings them any kind of pleasure beyond the knowledge that they are receiving sound basic nutrition?!

FickleOcelot · 25/11/2025 10:21

twolittles · 25/11/2025 09:45

God forbid we help disabled people get around. Shall we do away with the freedom pass too or are you ok with free public transport for disabled people ?

Outside of London, a lot of disabled people aren't getting free public transport.

Locally, you can get a concessionary pass which gives you free or discounted travel but only outside of peak times.

Burnnoticed · 25/11/2025 10:21

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:20

Woe betide any working person wants a decent car? Oh we have to pull ourselves up by our boot straps and scrimp and save for one

You do know "any working person" also includes disabled people?

333FionaG · 25/11/2025 10:21

Yet another ill-informed benefits bashing thread. I hope to God none of you against PIP/DLA/Motability ever become disabled and need financial support.

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 10:22

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:20

Woe betide any working person wants a decent car? Oh we have to pull ourselves up by our boot straps and scrimp and save for one

Weird how it isn’t scrimping and saving when people on PIP are having to go without to save for adaptations and advance payments every 3-5 years. Odd to pretend only the non-disabled are working people as well.

Burnnoticed · 25/11/2025 10:22

YorkshireGoldDrinker · 25/11/2025 10:20

The scheme should be for people who can't get about any other way and cannot afford a car.

Genuine need doesn't care about the brand. A car is a car. If people claiming PIP complain about this, then are they really and truly in need of a car and can't afford one? Or can they get by with a car and be grateful they're being given one in the first place?

Have you ever met a disabled person? You certainly haven't spoken to one about driving.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:22

Simonjt · 25/11/2025 10:22

Weird how it isn’t scrimping and saving when people on PIP are having to go without to save for adaptations and advance payments every 3-5 years. Odd to pretend only the non-disabled are working people as well.

whats being done for the young working people in this country?

OP posts:
FollowingAzureSeas · 25/11/2025 10:23

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 09:45

but the “weekly leasing charge” is £77 a week, or £240 a month. Leasing a Merc or other luxury car would cost a lot more than that. My mum’s Yaris is £500 a month for crying out loud

I'd put your energy into looking into why your Mum is being ripped off. The leasing costs on a Toyota Yaris are nowhere near £500. I pay less than that for a Volvo.

This thread is shocking. The luxury cars are paid for by the claimant, the subsidy is only the same as a basic model. But obviously disabled people should only have the basics. People disgust me.

OrangeeS · 25/11/2025 10:23

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:20

Woe betide any working person wants a decent car? Oh we have to pull ourselves up by our boot straps and scrimp and save for one

Would you prefer to have no legs? Would you swap? I bet you wouldn’t!!!

ChristmasTimeChristmasJoy · 25/11/2025 10:24

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Somersetbaker · 25/11/2025 10:25

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:20

Woe betide any working person wants a decent car? Oh we have to pull ourselves up by our boot straps and scrimp and save for one

Well you could go and get a couple of limbs cut off, then you'd be entitled to a car as well. I'm sure you could find a body modification group who would assist.

ClockGoesBack · 25/11/2025 10:25

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 25/11/2025 10:22

whats being done for the young working people in this country?

So the way to help young working people is by taking away from disabled?

Another76543 · 25/11/2025 10:26

colorpie · 25/11/2025 10:16

I feel sorry really for disabled people right now who rely on Motability help, PIP and so on. The knives are out for their essential benefits and the harpies (as evidenced by this thread) cannot wait to descend and kick them when they are down even when they don't have a proper grasp on how these benefits work. Human nature can be so ugly.

Edited

I don’t think it’s quite as simple as that. As a country, we do not have a bottomless pit of money. We need to make sure that everyone can have a decent standard of living, and the welfare state is an important part of that. The welfare state should absolutely provide a safety net for those less fortunate for whatever reason. As part of that, we need to make sure that the finite resources are used in the most effective and efficient way.

askmenow · 25/11/2025 10:26

Overthebow · 25/11/2025 09:35

Yes I agree. The scheme is needed but no way should Mercedes and BMWs have been included in it.

You know what they say…”follow the money”

1 in every 5 cars on the road is on the Motability Scheme.
Keeps car dealerships in business.
Keeps car sales stats inflated.
Gives a better overall impression of how the economy is performing.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.