Yes, because personal taxation is not the only source of governmental income, and nor is it the only measure of whether or not an individual contributes to the betterment of their society.
If you have a job, you are contributing some sort of service. That employer either provides a service, or does so and also generates a profit. That employer pays tax, the business generates revenue, the service is presumably in demand and fulfils a need.
As I say, it's a nonsense that failure to provide adequate services is repeatedly blamed on immigration, because the more citizens you have, the more that should benefit your economy. Public service provision comes at a cost, good public service requires adequate taxation to pay for it. If there is "not enough money", the question which needs to be asked is why the government of the day, faced with public demands for better/more services, is refusing to appropriately tax individuals and businesses in order to provide that, especially when it's against the backdrop of a growing population, and therefore potentially greater income through economic participation.
As I said, it's an ideological choice not to adequately and appropriately tax, one of the consequences of that choice is that you have to cut your cloth appropriately. It disproportionately affects those who rely on public service the most, and yet those worst affected are gullible enough to accept being told by the very people who are not being adequately and appropriately taxed, that the real problem is Abdul who just came over on a small boat 😂