Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Why do people not like Jeremy Corbyn?

263 replies

Grace040712 · 30/07/2025 02:55

I was at a family lunch the other day with my in-laws and they were all slating the man. However, when I asked why my mother in law could only come up with her lives in an ex council house and she doesn't like his suit.

These aren't attributes I particularly care about in politicians (or really in people in general). I much prefer to find out if they are kind, think of others, hard working, honest etc ...

So! To those who dislike and to those who do... What are our thoughts on Jeremy Corbyn?

OP posts:
MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 09:28

LidlAmaretto · 30/07/2025 09:23

That is entirely separate to the GFA, which led to relative peace in NI for the first time in how many years. Iraq was a terrible mistake. The GFA was not.

Blair's behaviour actively harmed the UKs security. Terror attacks rose exponentially after the invasion. He's hardly the arbiter of appropriate conduct.

SherlockHolmes · 30/07/2025 09:29

He doesn't support terrorism, he supports the causes that lead to terrorism.

Nelson Mandela was a terrorist, but his ideals and aims were worth fighting for.

Corbyn is someone who tries to understand where things are going wrong to try to put them right at source. Eg if you can make countries where migrants are coming from a better place for them to live then they won't need to leave.

His ideals make a lot of sense to me. He also has integrity - he wasn't sure personally whether to be in or out of Europe but would democratically do what the majority of his party wanted.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 09:32

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:24

Note the inability to address the actual points made about Corbyn.

You mean what would Corbyn do if Russia attacked? I assumed you were trolling. I'd be more worried about Farage who has actively expressed admiration for Putin.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 09:33

SherlockHolmes · 30/07/2025 09:29

He doesn't support terrorism, he supports the causes that lead to terrorism.

Nelson Mandela was a terrorist, but his ideals and aims were worth fighting for.

Corbyn is someone who tries to understand where things are going wrong to try to put them right at source. Eg if you can make countries where migrants are coming from a better place for them to live then they won't need to leave.

His ideals make a lot of sense to me. He also has integrity - he wasn't sure personally whether to be in or out of Europe but would democratically do what the majority of his party wanted.

Hmm...so he was trying to be PM but "wasn't sure personally whether to be in or out of Europe". ie sat on the fence and did nowt about the biggest question for the UK for decades. No ideals presumably. His protege Starmer learned well.

Disagree re the terrorism. He's a bad man because he can't see right from wrong.Terrorism means terrifying and killing civilians.

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:35

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 09:32

You mean what would Corbyn do if Russia attacked? I assumed you were trolling. I'd be more worried about Farage who has actively expressed admiration for Putin.

Well, Corbyn blamed NATO when Russia invaded Ukraine and when Russia executed an attack on UK soil with Novichok, Corbyn said that we should send the samples to Russia for Russia to investigate whether it was Russia that was behind the attack. Because he wasn't about to blame them for it even though it was obviously them.

There's a good chance that if Russia attacked the UK, Corbyn would think it was our fault.

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 09:40

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:35

Well, Corbyn blamed NATO when Russia invaded Ukraine and when Russia executed an attack on UK soil with Novichok, Corbyn said that we should send the samples to Russia for Russia to investigate whether it was Russia that was behind the attack. Because he wasn't about to blame them for it even though it was obviously them.

There's a good chance that if Russia attacked the UK, Corbyn would think it was our fault.

I imagine that if Russia attacked, Corbyn would act to defend the country which it would be his duty to do. I doubt even Farage would roll out the red carpet, though I'd hate to put that to the test.

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:43

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 09:40

I imagine that if Russia attacked, Corbyn would act to defend the country which it would be his duty to do. I doubt even Farage would roll out the red carpet, though I'd hate to put that to the test.

Are you sure that he wouldn't be heading up a Stop The War protest march?

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 09:43

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:43

Are you sure that he wouldn't be heading up a Stop The War protest march?

You're very amusing.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 09:44

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:43

Are you sure that he wouldn't be heading up a Stop The War protest march?

Corbyn would probably sit down with Putin in the House of Commons (assuming it was still in UK hands) and have a nice cup of tea and a chat.

noblegiraffe · 30/07/2025 09:49

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 09:44

Corbyn would probably sit down with Putin in the House of Commons (assuming it was still in UK hands) and have a nice cup of tea and a chat.

And if asked to condemn Russia bombing London or whatever, the most you'd get out of him is 'all bombings are bad'.

PrincessOfPreschool · 30/07/2025 09:52

Terrorism means terrifying and killing civilians.

How nice and simple. The UK and US government have therefore supported many terrorist regimes (as long as they could influence them).

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 30/07/2025 10:03

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 09:44

Corbyn would probably sit down with Putin in the House of Commons (assuming it was still in UK hands) and have a nice cup of tea and a chat.

And then become the next Alexander Litvinenko.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 13:08

PrincessOfPreschool · 30/07/2025 09:52

Terrorism means terrifying and killing civilians.

How nice and simple. The UK and US government have therefore supported many terrorist regimes (as long as they could influence them).

Which terrorists?

Grace040712 · 30/07/2025 13:39

I see! Thank you for all the comments!

As far as I have seen from Jeremy Corbyn he has been pro peace for his whole career through discussion (yes sometimes with the IRA or Putin), but surely you cannot be a diplomat without diplomacy? And diplomacy is build on communication - not bombs.

OP posts:
iseethembloom · 30/07/2025 13:40

Aaron95 · 30/07/2025 08:58

I never understood why we judge politicians by PMQs. Nobody ever actually answers a question. Instead it is a jeering contest as both leaders try to get in the best insults while their MPs cheer or boo accordingly. I would much prefer to have a leader who refuses to engage in the nonsense and instead addresses the question being asked.

Of course that’s what PMQs is - it’s a raucous, less formal debating forum. But unlike most, Jezza can’t even roll with the punches. Even upright ‘jam and Jerusalem / fields of wheat’ May could get into the spirit and go with it. Corbyn just stiffens and becomes extremely defensive and brittle. He’s not a leader.

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 13:43

Thulpelly · 30/07/2025 08:25

There was a smear campaign in the media at the time which made a lot of people dislike him for vague reasons. Others didn’t agree with his policies/politics.

I think he is one of the very few politicians with integrity and isn’t going to say something just to win votes and tow the party line.

He didn’t chase power/leadership but was nominated and won. For me, that’s a massive plus point - never trust someone who is trying to appoint themselves as leader.

Corbyn was not a fan of the EU, it was his personal view. He knew being openly pro Brexit would be a bad thing, and kept his mouth shut.
The majority of the people voting for Brexit were not fans of Corbyn.

Your last paragraph contradicts your second paragraph, and, though less directly, your third.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 13:44

Grace040712 · 30/07/2025 13:39

I see! Thank you for all the comments!

As far as I have seen from Jeremy Corbyn he has been pro peace for his whole career through discussion (yes sometimes with the IRA or Putin), but surely you cannot be a diplomat without diplomacy? And diplomacy is build on communication - not bombs.

So right. It's a shame he is so tainted by hanging out with people who support bombs.

crisppackets · 30/07/2025 13:45

Because he is a bigot. And yes you can be a left wing bigot.
And a bully
And hugely manipulative.

I think he’s just not a decent man

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 13:48

iseethembloom · 30/07/2025 13:40

Of course that’s what PMQs is - it’s a raucous, less formal debating forum. But unlike most, Jezza can’t even roll with the punches. Even upright ‘jam and Jerusalem / fields of wheat’ May could get into the spirit and go with it. Corbyn just stiffens and becomes extremely defensive and brittle. He’s not a leader.

There is a very amusing clip of Corbyn in PMQ. I know it's silly, but when an MP shouts out "who are you" he really doesn't cope well.

Jamaicanmoon · 30/07/2025 13:50

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 08:31

Apparently he's very popular with his constituents because he's a hard working, dedicated MP. His majority at the last election was over 7,000.

He's an activist, regularly joining marches from the 60s against social injustice and for civil rights. He votes with this in mind, and has stood firm against contentious issues such as the invasion of Iraq, of which he was a vocal opponent.

He's an old fashioned socialist; he wants renationalisation, redistribution of wealth, to tackle injustice and unfairness in society. When he was leader, Labour was the biggest left wing party in Europe. I believe 500,000 have now registered an interest in his new party, which isn't bad for its first week.

I'm just adding an alternative view to the usual right wing shtick.

That’s what’s wrong with him as a political leader. He’s an activist. Activist and prime Minister ( or any Minister) are two very different skill sets and mindset

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 13:53

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 13:48

There is a very amusing clip of Corbyn in PMQ. I know it's silly, but when an MP shouts out "who are you" he really doesn't cope well.

We have very different ideas on what 'amusing' means. People who vote and pay their taxes don't want a bunch of gaffawing chimps shouting over people trying to speak. Some want a sense of decorum and decency. I'm sick to death of bully boys dominating discourse.

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 13:58

MiloMinderbinder925 · 30/07/2025 13:53

We have very different ideas on what 'amusing' means. People who vote and pay their taxes don't want a bunch of gaffawing chimps shouting over people trying to speak. Some want a sense of decorum and decency. I'm sick to death of bully boys dominating discourse.

Oh OK.

You can please some of the people some of the time etc.

Rentitis · 30/07/2025 13:59

Andy Burnham clearly found that funny as well!

Quirkswork · 30/07/2025 14:03

Rentitis · 30/07/2025 13:59

Andy Burnham clearly found that funny as well!

Well let's face it (and looking at the faces of both people behind him..) everyone there did apart from him. Because he's a Very Serious Person.

Gingernaut · 30/07/2025 14:06

His performance during the Brexit referendum was shameful

Refusing to make a stand against the pro-Brexit vote, waiting to see how the electorate voted to 'take it from there' was just fucking idiotic

Instead of a solid campaign, he allowed Brexiteers to hijack the referendum and brought us to this fucked up mess