Thanks, for those Tucker Carlson clips Chris. I didn't watch it yesterday.
Tucker has been given his own show on Fox as they desperately try to win back the real conservative audience after their lack of support for Trump.
The "racist older white male" slur is the usual trick of the progressives to divide and rule people. Everybody now understands their "divide and rule" game and their desperate control of the news game via BBC and the teams etc and elimination of anything that offers a different view by calling it "fake news" etc. The elites are worried and their political class is trying to control the media to control the message.
A good article by former Telegraph editor and Thatcher biographer, Sir Charles Moore, who although being one of the elite, has joined the people and thrown his lot in with the people against the elite.
"I’m a part of the elite. So why am I cheering for the populist right?
If, in a parliamentary democracy, the establishment and the people
diverge, one must surely bet that the elites are wrong
...
So, if the free world is riven by a battle between the highly educated elites of which I am, I suppose, a part and a bunch of seditious oafs and show-offs, why do I nowadays find myself inclined to the latter? It may sound Marxist to say this, but I do think the elites have constructed a world order which serves their interests, not those of their subject populations.
...
The response of elites to their failures is too often to stigmatise the people who complain. Those who protest at immigration levels ten times higher than 30 years ago are treated as racists. Even the ballot box itself is seen as ‘populist’. Remainers argue that the referendum issues were ‘too complicated’ for voters. They seem actively to dislike the idea that our nation should once more be governed by its elected representatives. Having failed electorally, they turn to ‘lawfare’ — preferring a case before the Supreme Court to the direct implementation of what Parliament handed to the people to decide. Voters now believe that their rulers really do not like them very much, so the feeling becomes mutual.
In this respect, the culture war matters. You cannot go on saying that white straight males are brutes without eventually annoying them (and even a significant proportion of what John Prescott used to call their ‘womenfolk’). The cultural signals from the powerful are almost unthinkingly hostile to majority populations. This month, to take a minor example, a report into ‘diversity’ in the theatre commissioned by Andrew Lloyd Webber reported (reusing a phrase from Greg Dyke years ago) that it is ‘hideously white’. Why should the dominant racial characteristic of all western societies be considered ‘hideous’? If you said that anything was ‘hideously black’ you would (rightly) be shunned by polite society. Such asymmetry inspires revolt.
...
But if, in a parliamentary democracy, the elites and the voters markedly diverge, one must surely bet that the elites are likelier to be wrong. Strange if this has now become a ‘right-wing’ thought."
www.spectator.co.uk/2016/12/im-a-part-of-the-elite-so-why-am-i-cheering-for-the-populist-right/
Moore rightly says
"Voters now believe that their rulers really do not like them very much, so the feeling becomes mutual."
and
"The cultural signals from the powerful are almost unthinkingly hostile to majority populations"
but Moore does not really understand why this is the case. In reality, this is all part of the "divide and rule" strategy of the elites and the political class has no say in it since they are essentially puppets, here today booted out tomorrow, and relegated to the lecture circuit making money for speeches and granted book deals and popular entertainment TV shows by the elites to reward them for service to the elites.
Climate change is another one of the elite's cons and the puppets have no choice but to follow. Trump has frightened elites so much because he is not one of their puppets and he may not go along with them. His daughter, Ivanka, seems to have fallen for the elite's con game with Al Gore and Di Caprio, the pops stars, celebs etc, but Trump himself may be immune to the pop stars and that is what frightens the elites.
Sir Bob and Izzard won't have any effect on Trump, just as they didn't have on the British people in Brexit. And obviously, no one takes the hand gestures of Blair seriously. Trump will be immune to those however often the BBC displays them.
I saw this interview with Dr Tim Ball, a climate change sceptic scientist, where he says that he will soon be meeting Trump's team and where the interviewer says that the Al Gore stuff may not be the way Trump intends to go.
I saw Trump's Thank You Tour speech in Michigan last night and Trump brought up on stage the Australian who runs Dow Chemical and whom Trump has appointed to head up his Manufacturing Council. He was great and is setting up more jobs in Michigan and is fully on board with Trump's job message and business message of "America First" and "make America great again". The elite all tuned into the speech last night, from Davos and their plush abodes worldwide, and panicked when they realised that their deindustrialisation strategy (of which their climate change con is just one arm) is over and that the people are going to get jobs again.
The elites fear the game is up and their population control elitists' agenda is over.
Here is the interview with Dr Tim Ball saying he will be speaking to Trump's team (which sent the elites and their puppet class into a tizzy) and here is part 1 of an interview with Dr Tim Ball back in 2009 on the Alex Jones Show which gets into what the climate con is about.
The elites are on the ropes with Trump, and "fake news" is all they have left as they probably try to brand what Trump will say in the future as "fake news" too.