'do you think that Trump stirred up shit and fanned the flames of division and anger in order to win votes?'
No. He did say some things as a shock tactic in order to differentiate himself from teh "career politicians" in order to show the people that he was tough and would kick Establishment ass, but the people took him "seriously but not literally" while the media teams took him "literally but not seriously".
'What do you think about the violence he incited at rallies?'
He didn't incite violence. he was joking. He said he would pay the legal expenses of anyone who thumped the protestors. But Trump fans didn't take him literally while the media teams took him literally.
'What are his plans for the huge army he wants to build if he's going to be isolationist and peaceful?'
He won't use it. He said we will be so strong that no one will mess with us, we won't need to use it.
'Do you believe all of the conspiracy theories pushed by his team? '
What conspiracy theories? The Wikileaks leaks were not conspiracy theories, they were leaked emails of insiders.
'What do you think about his attacks on feminism and human rights? '
What attacks on feminism and human rights?
'Do you think the media should be allowed to criticise him, or is that "disrespectful"? '
Of course they should be allowed to. I think it is "disrespectful" of the Oxbridge teams to call him racist etc, but I don't care if they call him that because it just exposes them for the liars they are and more people see through their Establishment spin.
'What do you think of his environmental policies? '
I think they are fantastic. I just hope that the elites don't get to him and force him to back down. I hope he maintains the truth and exposes the lies.
'What do you think of his attitude to nuclear weapons?'
He said that nuclear is the biggest problem, not global warming and I think he is right.
'Do you think it's right for him to interfere with another countries energy policy or ambassadorial appointments?'
I don't care. He is about to be the President of the United States, so he can say what he likes. It is up to the Establishment to decide whether they agree with him or not.
'Why did it take him so long to disavow neo-nazis? '
It didn't, he has disavowed them lots of times. He did it again in the New York Times meeting. the media teams always bring this up to try to knock Trump, but he condemns it everytime they bring it up
"UNKNOWN: Mr. President-elect, I wanted to ask you, there was a conference this past weekend in Washington of people who pledged their allegiance to Nazism.
TRUMP: Boy, you are really into this stuff, huh?
PRIEBUS: I think we answered that one right off the bat.
Interactive Feature: Trump Tower, the Center of the Political Universe
UNKNOWN: Are you going to condemn them?
TRUMP: Of course I did, of course I did.
PRIEBUS: He already did.
UNKNOWN: Are you going to do it right now?
TRUMP: Oh, I see, maybe you weren’t here. Sure. Would you like me to do it here? I’ll do it here. Of course I condemn. I disavow and condemn."
www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html
'Are you able to answer any of those without mentioning the "establishment" the "elite" "Oxbridge" "Stump for Trump sisters" "spin" or "PPE".'
No, that would be impossible, because they are interlinked and intrinsic to the Trump Revolution, also known as the People's Revolution over the Elites.